In the past, images that I'd captured but where blurred due to camera motion were deleted with prejudice.
But after seeing the demonstration by the folks from Adobe labs about how they could correct an image that was blurred due to camera motion, I'm reconsidering the wisdom of this as it would seem that some images are not beyond saving like I thought they were. Sometimes circumstances are such that I get very few without some kind of motion blur - this can be because it was just too windy, I couldn't hold the camera still enough or something else.
The problem is that such images are had to review and or evaluate for "keeping".
But needless to say, I need to re-evaluate what gets archived/kept vs deleted.
Has Adobe's demonstration of blur from camera motion influenced the keep vs delete equation for anyone else?
Or are others just putting that in the "yeah, maybe sometime in the future but I'll believe it when I see it" and ignoring it?