Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Dealing with spam bots on this site  (Read 5295 times)

Christoph C. Feldhaim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2509
  • There is no rule! No - wait ...
Dealing with spam bots on this site
« on: April 02, 2012, 01:06:25 pm »

From time to time we have spam on the forums.
When I see this I usually use the "report" button on these posts for one time and report them as spam.

I just wonder if the moderators really want us to do this, since I don't want them to get spammed with spam reports.

So - Chris and Michael:
Do you want us to report spam, when we see it new or do you check for yourselves?

michael

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5084
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2012, 01:31:05 pm »

Yes, please do. It helps us notice them. It's then just a couple of key stokes to delete all their postings and ban their IP addresses.

We have lots of behind the scenes tech that screens out 95% of the spammers, but a few a week squeak through.

Michael
Logged

Christoph C. Feldhaim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2509
  • There is no rule! No - wait ...
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2012, 01:35:05 pm »

Great!
Now where's my jabberwock pet?
Lets go hunting!

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2012, 03:51:35 pm »

Good to know. I've been enjoying pressing the "report" button a few times recently.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2012, 04:06:33 pm »

Good to know. I've been enjoying pressing the "report" button a few times recently.



Are you attempting to create explosions in place of smileys? I didn't realise that was an option!

Rob C

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2012, 11:31:23 pm »

Watch it Rob, or I'll report you to the Principal!
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rhossydd

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3369
    • http://www.paulholman.com
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2012, 04:45:24 am »

I too have been regularly reporting the dodgy posts.
What's become rather tedious is the increase in spam to my mail account I use for LuLa (and I don't use it for anything else). Is there any possibility of making registration harder ? to try to avoid letting the spammers in ?
Logged

Christoph C. Feldhaim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2509
  • There is no rule! No - wait ...
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2012, 04:57:38 am »

The programmed intelligence in these bots is becoming better and better.
What I saw a couple of times is, that the bots were posting stuff which were citations or modifications of other posts which really looked human made on the first look.
Checking such a bots posting history revealed there was a mechanism behind - Turing test failed.
Same for registration - bots are getting better and better. If you want a 100% safe registration you'd need a human check - hard to believe this would be possible here without overwhelming the moderators. I think we just have to live with the fact and try out best to get rid of them.

Rhossydd

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3369
    • http://www.paulholman.com
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #8 on: April 03, 2012, 05:09:03 am »

you'd need a human check - hard to believe this would be possible here without overwhelming the moderators.
I'm sure the modatorial team will be aware of how many applications there are to join and if non-automatic promotion is a practicality. Maybe a two stage application process might help beat the bots ?
Logged

hjulenissen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2051
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #9 on: April 03, 2012, 05:09:35 am »

...If you want a 100% safe registration you'd need a human check - hard to believe this would be possible here without overwhelming the moderators. I think we just have to live with the fact and try out best to get rid of them.
I have also seen these pseudo-inteligent posts that seems like a rehash of previous post. At first, they seem to make sense, but the username together with the number of previous posts is often telling.

Community effort:
Initial registration grants you the rights to only post in a single thread ("newbies corner"). You are required to post a couple of sentences about yourself and one image that you have taken yourself. This image must also contain your lula username in some form. Once other members have confirmed that your post seems legit, there is a dedicated "approve" button that bump your status to regular user.

Pros:
No extra case-to-case work for the admins (but probably some initial setup work).
Quick response time
I doubt that spam bots creators find it worth the effort to circumvent it.

Cons:
I dont know if the current level of spam warrants the extra work...

-h
Logged

michael

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5084
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #10 on: April 03, 2012, 11:06:30 am »

The number of spambots and human spammers that actually get though our automated filters is very small; not worth spending any time or money on.

Michael
Logged

Bryan Conner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 539
    • My Flickr page
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #11 on: April 03, 2012, 11:08:21 am »

It would be nice if we could all send the spammer spam.  You know...fight fire with fire.
Logged

Christopher Sanderson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2694
    • photopxl.com
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #12 on: April 03, 2012, 11:36:58 am »

Actually since I have instituted a host of silly questions of registrants, the incidence of spam is less than 10% of what it was. However I now spend more time helping registrants answer the silly questions - but we are much less bothered by spammers

fredjeang

  • Guest
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #13 on: April 03, 2012, 04:22:53 pm »

Actually since I have instituted a host of silly questions of registrants, the incidence of spam is less than 10% of what it was. However I now spend more time helping registrants answer the silly questions - but we are much less bothered by spammers
Ahhh...
Now I understand why you hardly post in the motion section. Too busy with the spammers...

Come on Michael ! We need Chris's posts and experience back in the video section.

(while I'm writing this, I'd like to ask: in English is it possible to put the 's even if the last letter is a S ? I can write Michael's posts but is it the same with Chris's posts?)
« Last Edit: April 03, 2012, 04:26:35 pm by fredjeang »
Logged

michael

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5084
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2012, 04:27:07 pm »

In English, if a word already ends with an "s", to make it plural you put an apostrophe after the "s", so for example, Chris'.

Michael
Logged

fredjeang

  • Guest
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #15 on: April 03, 2012, 04:37:26 pm »

Thanks Michael.

Cheers.
Logged

Christopher Sanderson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2694
    • photopxl.com
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #16 on: April 03, 2012, 04:47:03 pm »

In English, if a word already ends with an "s", to make it plural you put an apostrophe after the "s", so for example, Chris'.

Michael

...I think he means 'possessive' not 'plural'   ::)

Gary Brown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 211
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #17 on: April 03, 2012, 04:48:18 pm »

(while I'm writing this, I'd like to ask: in English is it possible to put the 's even if the last letter is a S ? I can write Michael's posts but is it the same with Chris's posts?)

Opinions vary, but the oft-cited Chicago Manual of Style's rule is to add apostrophe-s to singular nouns regardless of whether they end in s — thus, the horse's mouth, a bass's stripes, Chris's posts — and add an apostrophe alone to plural nouns unless it's an irregular plural that doesn't end in “s” — thus puppies' paws, children's literature.

Their rules do include several exceptions, and they end up saying, “Those uncomfortable with the rules, exceptions, and options outlined above may prefer the system, formerly more common, of simply omitting the possessive s on all words ending in s — hence ‘Dylan Thomas' poetry,’ ‘Maria Callas' singing,’ and ‘that business' main concern.’ Though easy to apply, that usage disregards pronunciation and thus seems unnatural to many.”
Logged

fredjeang

  • Guest
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #18 on: April 03, 2012, 04:51:18 pm »

...I think he means 'possessive' not 'plural'   ::)
Can't we be have both? I'm possessive, and plural. ;)
Logged

fredjeang

  • Guest
Re: Dealing with spam bots on this site
« Reply #19 on: April 03, 2012, 04:55:20 pm »

Opinions vary, but the oft-cited Chicago Manual of Style's rule is to add apostrophe-s to singular nouns regardless of whether they end in s — thus, the horse's mouth, a bass's stripes, Chris's posts — and add an apostrophe alone to plural nouns unless it's an irregular plural that doesn't end in “s” — thus puppies' paws, children's literature.

Their rules do include several exceptions, and they end up saying, “Those uncomfortable with the rules, exceptions, and options outlined above may prefer the system, formerly more common, of simply omitting the possessive s on all words ending in s — hence ‘Dylan Thomas' poetry,’ ‘Maria Callas' singing,’ and ‘that business' main concern.’ Though easy to apply, that usage disregards pronunciation and thus seems unnatural to many.”

It's getting more complicated than I thought...but I think I got it.

The spammers' posts
Chris's posts
and if I'm uncomfortable with the rules: Chris' posts
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up