i just read on the capture integration website that the rm2/3d front standard can be used on my 6x9 f metric. would there be much in the way of monetary savings in going this route over the purchase of a complete rm2/3d camera system? are there any other logistical problems that would come up?
David -
Using the RM3Di (for example) as the front standard on your F-Metric really only eliminates the need/desire for the VarioFinder. The base R camera consists of the RM2D/RM3DiRL3D body, VarioFinder, Digital Back Interface (which would be required for the F-Metric anyway), and of course, the lenses mounted in R Bayonet. You wouldn't really save much (the cost of the VarioFinder, perhaps). And actually, while this isn't necessarily a bad idea, you're approach is from the opposite direction than what usually makes sense. Meaning, one would normally start with an RM3Di, then perhaps add an F-Metric or M-Monolith/M-Two to expand on the available movements, introduce bellows extension, etc. Using the F-Metric with a wide lens and focusing through ground glass is not ideal.
So - what it really comes down to is that if shooting really wide is at the critical end of your application, then the RM3Di makes sense regardless. Whether you would also choose to integrate it with your F-Metric (ideally with longer lenses) would be a potential path. But you could then also take the lenses for your F-Metric and mount them in R Bayonet and have 1 lens set with either configuration, since there is a lens plate with a R Bayonet screw-in for use with the F-Metric without also having to mount it in the RM3Di.
Steve Hendrix