Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Remove dazzle?  (Read 1541 times)

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3296
Remove dazzle?
« on: March 13, 2012, 06:06:29 pm »

An experiment with the aim of reducing the size of the sun to something realistic.
And finding a subject on the Great Plains.
Question: is the dazzle beneath the sun a problem? What is this caused by?
Scott

stpf8

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
    • Stephen Penland Photography
Re: Remove dazzle?
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2012, 12:10:46 am »

I don't think it's a problem.  Many viewers may see this as a positive attribute.  My semi-educated guess is that it's caused by diffraction due to water vapor.  The brightness of the foreground on the left may be more of an issue -- I wish that could be toned down a bit.  I think this is a very good photograph of the Great Plains:  bright and smooth clouds, very distant trees that provide just a hint of relief on the horizon, a road that goes on forever, and the remnants of crops waiting for a new cycle -- it's a wonderful combination of elements.
Logged
Stephen Penland
www.stephenpenland.com

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3296
Re: Remove dazzle?
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2012, 04:34:51 pm »

Yeah, it's just lens flare. Guess I need a bigger lens hood. :)
I have turned down the flare a bit on the next version, and toned down the brightness at the bottom left: thanks, Stephen.
BTW, no trees here -- those are grain bins.
Scott

Rendezvous

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
    • Daniel Talbot Photo Blog
Re: Remove dazzle?
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2012, 06:06:17 pm »

I don't think a lens hood would help you in this shot, i.e. when you're shooting directly at the sun. Nice shot by the way.

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Remove dazzle?
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2012, 08:19:40 pm »

Why on Earth you would remove that flare, when it is exactlly what gives the whole picture its, well... flair!?

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3296
Re: Remove dazzle?
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2012, 11:52:14 pm »

Why on Earth you would remove that flare, when it is exactlly what gives the whole picture its, well... flair!?

That's the question, Slobodan. I was curious to know how people felt about it.
There seems to be a pro-flare consensus.
Scott

stpf8

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
    • Stephen Penland Photography
Re: Remove dazzle?
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2012, 01:56:22 am »

I thought they might be lombardy poplars (rather wide ones) providing shelter for a farmhouse.  But as a visual break in the distant horizon, the grain bins are serving the same function.
Logged
Stephen Penland
www.stephenpenland.com

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3296
Re: Remove dazzle?
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2012, 11:29:05 am »

Stephen: yes, I should have gotten a little closer to the grain bins so that there was something else in the image. But it was more of an exposure experiment than a picture. The pictures on your website are really nice.

Rendezvous: thanks! I'm afraid I was joking about a bigger lens hood.

Scott
Pages: [1]   Go Up