I would strongly recommend the PhaseOne over the leaf. You can read about them on my website http://brianhirschfeldphotography.com/2011/12/07/leaf-aptus-ii-10-on-phaseone-645df/ of course I own a PhaseOne, and like anyone who owns anything is consequently bias, but I found the PhaseOne cameras to be built significantly better.
Brian, indeed seems biased but also a very odd review pertaining to Leaf and seeming with a steep misunderstanding and lack of knowledge of the systems. I doubt that you given suffice time to fully understand the Leaf. When you initially state "comparable PhaseOne P65+" in regards to Aptus-II 10 I believe this shows precisely so. Not only that, but the P65+ has a better sensor that seems to place it between Aptus-II 10 and Aptus-II 12/IQ180 in image quality. Actually I found the Aptus-II 10 to be only slight improvement in image quality over Aptus-II 6 & 7 per my personal review when deciding to upgrade my prior Leaf. It is not only about having about same number of pixels but about sensor design and more. You go on to state that "I think that PhaseOne 645AFD (and the Mamiya) are the best built 645 camera bodies on the planet." That is something that most would tend to not agree upon, since these are originally old designs that are very clunky and not comfortable to hold. It is said that the DF body is better, because better AF etc, but... that is being marketed while Phase One / Mamiya redesign to get a proper camera built from scratch. It appears that the best medium format body current is the Hy6, which regrettably had an old business problem... but seems most would who have handled it seem to agree it is by far the best. And yes, I am biased, but I also owned Mamiya AFD, AFDIII prior to it, and no way I wish to return to Mamiya due to many problems with the 645 system! In comparison to my Rolleiflex, the Mamiy is frank horrible. The Hy6 have made me enjoy photography again, rather than fighting the gear. And yes, I used Mamiya 645 system during nearly five years! Not to mention the lenses... I had many Mamiya including two D lenses. I would recommend large format digital lenses any day, there is no comparison, except for some of the Rollei that are said to be about a sharp...
If you research you will find that actual users of Leaf seem to be without complaints and seemingly agree that the backs are stellar. Except for the few that are initially are misunderstanding them when learning them, and are quick put in right direction and with support by e.g. Phase One Product Manager Yair Shahir who is present in these forums. No other brand offers that level of quick support, including Phase One (although some of their USA agents are present on LuLa). The Phase One backs have long been complained for having a very poor tiny display that does not even show the histogram with much information. While the display on Leaf remains the largest in the business it has never been claimed to be a touch screen interface like you assumed it to be in your write up. Rather it is a tool that works excellent. Some complained of the older Aptus series screens that they could not view it in bright sunlight. Well... that is not what it is for, but the Aptus-II backs have a display that is improved, however already the Aptus display and its usefulness for accurate histogram information and associated features beat Phase One interface hands down, which is something any potential buyer should take a look at. All Aptus II backs also have or can be upgraded to get the new GUI, no cost. Phase One stays same... old interface, poor histogram.
Thus seems that rather than be barking at and publishing something that shows that you have barely made yourself familiar with, you may wish to accurate test it further prior doing so, or simply not write at all of it. It would be better for your credibility, which per the write up on Aptus-II 10 seems very dubvious to be frank, since it seems to go against basically all Leaf users who witness of the durability and very high image quality of Leaf. I encourage anyone to make a search here on LuLa and/or fourm.getdpi.com.
As far as biased, I use Leaf but would without a doubt also recommendPhase One for someone. The like of the interface and character of the files is a mere preference. As implied in above, if for the same price being able to get P65+ or Aptus-II 10, based on image quality I would recommend P65+. Likewise, because of sensor I recommend Aptus-II 6 over P30+. As for the interface and display, I am of view that the Leaf is superior to non IQ backs when it comes to useful info from the display and user interface --- however I state that is mere based on my preference, though I encourage to compare the displays and the histogram information. Leaf has plenty of information related to histogram, please download a user guide. The IQ backs are more iPhone like, but... is it useful? And... and suffice to justify the very steep added $$$price?
Leaf is solid 500%, and not at all as your article imply. Your article is plain WRONG and MISLEADING. I know I can trust Leaf which others feel they can do with Phase One. That is ok. However it is also about support. Now that is one thing that can vary in different regions. In Hong Kong the Leaf agent gives me 500% support also per an international phone call when I am outside Hong Kong and also on a Sunday!!! Also when outside of warranty. That is also one reason why I upgraded to the 80MP Leaf. I cannot say that of the Phase One agent in Hong Kong, who was frank one reason to why I picked Leaf in first place...
Best regards,
Anders