I have been very happy with the results of soft proofing and printing 16 MP RW2 files from a Panasonic G3 to a Canon 9500. I soft proof the file using a canned icc profile for the paper/printer then switch to the print module, with no change in the appearance of the file on screen, then print it and get what I expect, give or take minor differences attritutable to screen brightness, ambient light etc. I then decide to revisit some 6 MP 2004 Canon Raw files from an EOS 300D to see if the 2012 process can get more out of them. Developing goes ok, but printing is a problem. The soft proofing part goes as expected, but then when I switch to the print module the file on screen heavily loses saturation. Oranges turn to dull yellows. Then when I actually print, the colors go back to more or less what they were in the Develop Module, but the print looks significantly darker than I expected, which hadn't been happening with the 2012 files. Nothing unmanageable here with a few test prints, but I don't understand why the file should look so different in the Develop and Print Modules or why the file as printed should be so much darker than the file on screen, all other variables being kept constant, AFAIK. Is this a bug, or just evidence that one should not expect miracles out of old files? I am using 64 bit windows 7.