Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: Ken Rockwell  (Read 17231 times)

Christoph C. Feldhaim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2509
  • There is no rule! No - wait ...
Re: Ken Rockwell
« Reply #60 on: February 28, 2012, 03:26:35 PM »

Awesome, just awesome.
I start loving this thread.
I can't remember I had that much fun here the last weeks ....

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11076
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Ken Rockwell
« Reply #61 on: February 28, 2012, 04:13:31 PM »

It beats anything on KR's site for pure entertainment! Bravo, people!

Eric
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

Scott O.

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 317
    • Photography by Scott and Joyce
Re: Ken Rockwell
« Reply #62 on: February 28, 2012, 07:00:05 PM »

When you people make recommendations for me to buy really cool equipment that you personally have tested very thoroughly, make sure the button is handy which will link me directly to the vendor.  That way, you can collect the fabulous royalties you deserve for hawking the product in the first place.  After all, I suspect you are supporting the growth of your growing families by getting me to support you by buying the aforementioned really cool equipment that you have decided is the greatest in the history of all photography.

Bryan Conner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 526
    • My Flickr page
Re: Ken Rockwell
« Reply #63 on: February 29, 2012, 12:31:59 AM »

I heard a rumor from myself (actually an unidentified voice in my head) just now that one of the large camera manufacturers is developing lens technology based on the X-Ray glasses that we used to read about on the back page of Superman comic books.  The rumored specs are unbelievable.  You can actually read about the technology here  http://tomheroes.com/images/COMICAD%20xray%20glasses.JPG
« Last Edit: February 29, 2012, 12:35:06 AM by Bryan Conner »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14460
Re: Ken Rockwell
« Reply #64 on: February 29, 2012, 03:45:49 AM »

X-Ray lens technology was investigated way back during WW2 and then abandoned: it didn't work well at all because the moment the target was found, it became invisible because the lens allowed the operator to see right through it - the target, that is, not the lens, though in a sense, you could do that as well, if you were the operator.

That's why Kilroy was brought into play: his alternative methods of snooping became both highly efficient and, ultimately, legendary.

Rob C
« Last Edit: February 29, 2012, 09:33:25 AM by Rob C »
Logged

Bryan Conner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 526
    • My Flickr page
Re: Ken Rockwell
« Reply #65 on: February 29, 2012, 08:39:58 AM »

X-Ray lens technology was investigated way back during WW2 and then abandoned: it didn't work well at all because the moment the target was found, it became invisible because the lens allowed the operator to see right through it- the target, that is, not the lens, though in a sense, you could do that as well, if you were the operator.

That's why Kilroy was brought into play: his alternative methods of snooping became both highly efficient and, ultimately, legendary.

Rob C


So, this explains why I am never able to make that perfect capture...it is always disappearing!
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14460
Re: Ken Rockwell
« Reply #66 on: February 29, 2012, 09:39:55 AM »

So, this explains why I am never able to make that perfect capture...it is always disappearing!



Happy to have been of service, se˝or. Now you know to leave sharks' penes alone.

Sadly, this song will never sound the same to me again...

http://youtu.be/EzahOCCt78o

Rob C
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up