The article was a nice reflection, but it overlooked another longer and deeper problem with Kodak. It fundamentally did not care about its customers beyond them being a short term profit center to be milked as efficiently as possible. This was before the shift to digital. Before Fuji showed up on the scene with punchy films. Recall the complete longevity failure of their color negative films and papers way back when. They shoved these down their customers throats, especially wedding photographers, and then not only ignored but actively suppressed any reporting on the problem. Many photographers went out of business over the issues as their customers photos faded incredibly fast. Negatives weren't recoverable. Kodak washed its hands of the problem and the photographers were caught in between their vendor's indifference and their customer's rage. Now we have a whole generation of wedding photos lost, NASA spending millions refrigerating and scanning film, and Hollywood films lost.
Kodak had many great people at it who innovated and added much to the world of photography. Unfortunately, the corporation itself just never gave a damn. They should have died decades ago. Yeah, they are under "reorganization" and not dead. Really, though, the photographic community would be better off if this corporation had been burned to the ground in the 1970s and the talent picked up or reorganized into organizations that actually gave a crap about their customer base.
Good riddance Kodak - you won't be missed even if a few of your products will be.
Ken