Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Nec or Eizo...  (Read 17264 times)

digitaldog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20646
  • Andrew Rodney
    • http://www.digitaldog.net/
Re: Nec or Eizo...
« Reply #20 on: January 24, 2012, 07:38:48 pm »

Well said Steve.
Logged
http://www.digitaldog.net/
Author "Color Management for Photographers".

Steve Weldon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1479
    • Bangkok Images
Re: Nec or Eizo...
« Reply #21 on: January 24, 2012, 09:06:36 pm »

Well said Steve.
Thanks.  Unfortunately anecdotal evidence/responses are rife on the internet, but not useful unless the dice roll in your favor. 
Logged
----------------------------------------------
http://www.BangkokImages.com

Ellis Vener

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2151
    • http://www.ellisvener.com
Re: Nec or Eizo...
« Reply #22 on: January 25, 2012, 11:20:02 am »

Yes, my Eizo came with a 5 year guarantee, but if you read the small print it excludes just about everything that could wrong with a monitor. (That said, I haven't read of anyone having problems with the Eizo.)

Here's the guy I corresponded with. He had 6 bad NEC monitors in a row, and only found a solution with the Eizo:

http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/oeeLHGDEjWkn90ICViRO

I have an Eizo CG222W which came with a two year warranty. At the 23 month stage it started to develop a line of "hot pixels" across the center of the screen.

I contacted Eizo and we went through various steps, including switching out cables and trying the display with different computers  - no luck, worse the  line of bad pixels  had now split and become two lines.

Eizo's techs said to send it back for testing and sent along an RMA and shipping tag. I did and three weeks later it came back  with a completely new LCD and backlight assembly, and maybe for all I know a new video card inside as well.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2012, 11:22:51 am by Ellis Vener »
Logged

Noah Chen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2
Re: Nec or Eizo...
« Reply #23 on: February 08, 2012, 12:26:56 pm »

Go for Eizo! No question it is the best monitor you could have. ( I have a NEC 2690 as well, Eizo is a lot mor expensive in my country.)
Logged

PierreVandevenne

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 512
    • http://www.datarescue.com/life
Re: Nec or Eizo...
« Reply #24 on: February 08, 2012, 05:34:00 pm »

Thanks.  Unfortunately anecdotal evidence/responses are rife on the internet, but not useful unless the dice roll in your favor. 

My gut reaction as well. But after reading this person's posts on the colorsync mailing list and checking his profile, he seems competent (very) and rational. Maybe he has very strict criteria.

But serial failures, sometimes on a large scale, aren't uncommon. I've seen about a hundred dead WD drives of the same model (factory contamination), roughly the same number of IBM drives fail (glass platter unstability), most HP and Samsung 30" monitors, including mine, seem to have failed (capacitors with insufficient temperature rating/lack of ventilation), scores of ASUS dead motherboards (bad capacitors from the same supplier), etc...

Remember the 5DMKII serial failures reported here after the Antartica trip: it first seemed that the 5DMKII was totally unreliable. After that initial hiccup, the camera seemed to do quite well.

It could be that NEC received a batch of substandard parts such as sub-par LVDS cables and corrected it. That would be consistent with a bad batch.

I am currently using a PA271w and am relatively happy. But I have seen a couple with localized color casts as well. I chose NEC because out of the 50 monitors or so I purchased over the years, 2 out of 3 EIZO failed and none of the NEC (I still have a functional Multisync 3D, useless, but happily clunking).

Logged

Christopher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1499
    • http://www.hauser-photoart.com
Re: Nec or Eizo...
« Reply #25 on: February 16, 2012, 03:51:58 pm »

I can only vote for Quato or Eizo. Both are quite good. Currently I have a Quato ( before that a 30'' eizo) and I love it.
Logged
Christopher Hauser
[email=chris@hauser-p

Schwenny

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
Re: Nec or Eizo...
« Reply #26 on: April 13, 2012, 10:17:11 am »

I did after all end up buying the NEC Spectraview 271... I looked at the two in another store and they were different but not that I could see that one was better than the other. Now I'm calibrating it to my MacBook Pro so I'm curious to see the difference to my old NEC Spectraview 2690...

HÃ¥kan
Logged

Czornyj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1949
    • zarzadzaniebarwa.pl
Re: Nec or Eizo...
« Reply #27 on: April 14, 2012, 07:11:49 am »

I can only vote for Quato or Eizo. Both are quite good. Currently I have a Quato ( before that a 30'' eizo) and I love it.

New Quato Intelliproof 300 ex and 270 ex are rebranded NEC PA271W and PA301W displays.
Logged
Marcin Kałuża | [URL=http://zarzadzaniebarwa
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up