I do not mind so much when a grand old man like Kodak retires, leaving many active and productive off-spring (like photography accessible to the masses, and digital photography) ... so long as nothing of current value is lost. Maybe all the new technology stuff like Kodak's many digital imaging patents will be better off sold or licensed to companies that are in a better position to deliver their value to users (like the sensor division, already sold).
Can a re-organized, drastically downsized "twilight" Kodak just keep its film-related production going until its natural course runs out, as Ilford seems to be doing?