Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?  (Read 12885 times)

henrikfoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 899
Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« on: January 05, 2012, 12:43:51 pm »

I have seen very impressing results from Hcam and the canon 24 ts and 17 ts.
From what I can see these results are better than I can get with my DF body and wide lenses.

But have anybody compared these results totecnical cameras with rel LF lenses?

Henrik
Logged

henrikfoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 899
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2012, 05:33:52 pm »

Thank you, Thomas!
I am realy impressed by what Canon are doing!!!
Logged

haefnerphoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 679
    • http://www.jameshaefner.com
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2012, 08:20:22 pm »

I just looked at Rainer's test and the way I read it the 24 was on a 5dmk2, so it has nothing to do with the question.  I'd be interested in the answer though.  My guess is that the LF lenses will be sharper do to their design but the angle of view would be spectacular with the 17 and 24.  Michael has tested the 17 I believe a while back (perhaps the 24 also), as I recall the 24 still allowed for some shift.  Hartblei has a collar for the t/s lens that allows the lens to stay stationary and the camera shifts.  Of course, the other advantage of the tech camera is the capability to shift both horizontally and vertically.   Jim
Logged

rainer_v

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1194
    • http://www.tangential.de
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2012, 08:25:55 am »

yes .. but its not only about sharpness. the great advantage of the HR lenses is that they are sharp even if not stopped down. the canons behave here more "traditional". best to stop them down to 11 or even f13.
BUT ... if other aspects as pure sharpness may count, the canons are superior ( at f13 tehy are comparable with the HR lenses in terms of sharpness too ), e.g. in terms of geometric distortion they are i.m.o. better as well as with handling of flare of any kind.
Logged
rainer viertlböck
architecture photograp

haefnerphoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 679
    • http://www.jameshaefner.com
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2012, 09:04:06 am »

Now the question becomes (assuming we want more resolution) do we purchase the Hartblei camera or wait for the anticipated 36mp bodies that the Nikon and Canon rumor mill have coming.  Jim
Logged

henrikfoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 899
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2012, 09:20:10 am »

It would have been nice if anybody could test the lenses with the same back?
I am sure it has been done allready...?

If it's just as good as the Schneider/Rodenstock, the Hcam is a good investment.
Logged

Peter Devos

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 518
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2012, 09:28:52 am »

The Hartblei always is a good investment. It is a great camera for wide angle but in studio it is also a super workhorse. I use it almost dayly in studio and simply love it. I am about to have my Sinar Artec modified to Hasselblad H and will than be able to compare the 28mm HR to the 24mm on the HB1.
Logged

henrikfoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 899
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2012, 09:44:50 am »

So I guess we will look for your used ArTec, and then we will know the result from your tests :D

Henrik

Please let us know what you find out.
Logged

yaya

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1254
    • http://yayapro.com
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2012, 11:54:52 am »

Stefan Steib has got some images from tests he's done with the Aptus-II 12

The 17mm IMO is a bit "extreme" and tends to stretch everything that is not in the centre, but the 24mm is excellent and has a large image circle

s.steib@hartblei.de

Yair
Logged
Yair Shahar | Product Manager | Phase One - Cultural Heritage
e: ysh@phaseone.com |

Stefan.Steib

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
    • HCam - Hartblei Pro Photography solutions
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2012, 02:54:01 pm »

I have already posted several links here or in GetDPI to full res images with Canon TSE 17+24mmV2, here is a full rez 80 mpix with the 17mm  f11,5:

http://www.hcam.de/downloads/Leaf80Mpix_Canon17mmTSE.jpg

and here a series from the PPL Openhouse - 17mm + 24mm TSE - a shot with the Nikon 14-24mmG-ED at14mm (I am 100 % sure cutting off the sunshade will allow full image cover at least for the P45+) and something that we did not even speak about - how would you like to get a MF Autofokus Zoom from Zeiss that works flawlessly on the Canon 5DMk2 AND for MF from 70mm-300mm ? It´s a Conurus converted Zeiss Contax N Vario Sonnar 70-300mm with Canon EF mount, 2 shots supplied 70mm and 300mm same position full zoom. Conurus sells converted samples of this directly from their website for 1000 $  (http://conurus.com/contax/buy-a-lens-that-has-already-been-modified)

All jpgs full res directly from Capture one 6.3.3 100 %

http://www.hcam.de/downloads/HCam-P45Plus-24mmTSE-F11.jpg
http://www.hcam.de/downloads/HCam-P45Plus-17mmTSE-F11.jpg
http://www.hcam.de/downloads/HCam-P45Plus-Nik14-24GED-F11.jpg
http://www.hcam.de/downloads/HCam-P45Plus-Zeiss70-300VarioSonnar70mm-F11.jpg
http://www.hcam.de/downloads/HCam-P45Plus-Zeiss70-300VarioSonnar300mm-F11.jpg

and there are so much more usable lenses - look here:
http://www.hcam.de/downloads/LensList-HCam.pdf


Greetings from Munich
Stefan

« Last Edit: January 06, 2012, 02:59:50 pm by Stefan.Steib »
Logged
Because Photography is more than Technology and "as we have done it before".

Stefan.Steib

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
    • HCam - Hartblei Pro Photography solutions
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2012, 06:34:46 am »

I have just uploaded two more images to my website - these are IQ180 nearly (70% - the real thing is too big) full res (jpg´s) -one with 24mm Canon TSE- the other from the same camera position with the 17mm TSE.
This demonstrates very good the huge improvement in angle with the 17mm - and how nicely this could be used for crops of the varioust formats. The 17mm still has some mm of movements with the 80 Mpix ! There was NO whiteshot done,  nor any lens distortion corrections and only a bit of light falloff (no center filter needed). If you watch the borders in the channels (especially green!) we have full saturation and few chromas, thus full information from center to border !!! And this is because it´s retrofocus with about 65mm of distance from the back lens to the chip

http://www.hcam.de/downloads/IQ180-24mmTSE-02.jpg

http://www.hcam.de/downloads/IQ180-17mmTSE-01.jpg

attention BIG files nearly 60 MB

Greetings from Munich
Stefan

PS.: Have cleaned the dust I saw, ran a low unsharp mask and done a tad saturation+ on one file and a minus on the other to equalize them.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2012, 08:16:06 am by Stefan.Steib »
Logged
Because Photography is more than Technology and "as we have done it before".

uaiomex

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1211
    • http://www.eduardocervantes.com
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #12 on: January 11, 2012, 04:37:06 pm »

When will these 2 lenses from Canon stop to amaze me!
Sharp pictures with usable corners on a full frame medium format digital back?
Wow!
Thanks Stefan
Eduardo


 
I have just uploaded two more images to my website - these are IQ180 nearly (70% - the real thing is too big) full res (jpg´s) -one with 24mm Canon TSE- the other from the same camera position with the 17mm TSE.
This demonstrates very good the huge improvement in angle with the 17mm - and how nicely this could be used for crops of the varioust formats. The 17mm still has some mm of movements with the 80 Mpix ! There was NO whiteshot done,  nor any lens distortion corrections and only a bit of light falloff (no center filter needed). If you watch the borders in the channels (especially green!) we have full saturation and few chromas, thus full information from center to border !!! And this is because it´s retrofocus with about 65mm of distance from the back lens to the chip


attention BIG files nearly 60 MB

Greetings from Munich
Stefan

PS.: Have cleaned the dust I saw, ran a low unsharp mask and done a tad saturation+ on one file and a minus on the other to equalize them.
Logged

Stefan.Steib

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
    • HCam - Hartblei Pro Photography solutions
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #13 on: January 11, 2012, 05:03:58 pm »

Eduardo

there is a not so much known fact about the newest Canon Lenses which are (to my knowledge) 17mm TSE, 24mm TSE V2, 8-15mm Fisheye Zoom

They use pressed/molded lenses, allowing aspherical constructions not possible with any other technology. You will see it best when you look into the frontlens
of the 17mm directly from the side. There is a "fingerlike" hole in the back of the frontlens, which could not be made with grinding/polishing traditional technology.
Now this is a very interesting point. It actually means that Canon can do lenses with the exact same focal lenght, focuspoints and calibration data, which means (I believe)
they can do these lenses in automated production, one like the other, like prints made of glass. The only variation will come from mounting in differing barrel parts
(this also means there will be mostly very good lenses, very few bad samples).

This is a technology that stands out and is probably giving them some years of development headroom against the competition, including Zeiss, Schneider and Rodenstock.
I would also think that if they would launch a Pro line (which they are doing now with the cinelenses!!!!) with even better tolerances for the barrels they can reach or surpass
their used sensor resolutions for only a  bit higher cost but with a significantly better margin.

As I may have said before - I admire Japanese engineering - it always is orientated long term, regarding to kaizen AND company strategy. Very, very clever.........

Greetings from Munich
Stefan

 
« Last Edit: January 11, 2012, 06:09:08 pm by Stefan.Steib »
Logged
Because Photography is more than Technology and "as we have done it before".

henrikfoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 899
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #14 on: January 11, 2012, 05:36:58 pm »

Hi Stefan!

Thank you for the information.
Up to what focal lenghth will this new technology be superior?

Is is just important for the very wide lenses?

Henrik
Logged

Stefan.Steib

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
    • HCam - Hartblei Pro Photography solutions
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #15 on: January 11, 2012, 06:03:15 pm »

Hi Henrik

I am not Canon, but as far as I can say: For any focal lenght ! I think they put this technology into all critical processes first - I believe most if not all
new lenses with large asphericals will use this - e.g. here:

http://cinescopophilia.com/canon-xj95x8-6b-super-telephoto-long-zoom-hd-field-lens/

"...The new lens is engineered with many of Canon’s most advanced technologies, including powerful optical design tools, new glass materials, and new exotic optical coatings. Canon’s proprietary large-diameter aspherical lens technology and new glass materials minimize lateral chromatic aberration, monochromatic aberrations, and geometric distortion that have always challenged large focal-length ranges. Significant reduction of these aberrations enhances the superb resolution and contrast in a manner that contributes to the capture of images with superb picture sharpness across the 16:9 HD image plane..."

but also for the consumer range to improve compactness and optical performance on high zoom factor compacts:

http://usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/digital_cameras/powershot_elph_520_hs?selectedName=Features

there is even more info available directly from canon but you have to read between the lines, they do not say something about where they use what:

http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/tech/room/hikyu.html          (this site has a lot more interesting details about canon lens technology)

My info about this came directly from Canon Germany last May on the PCP Tour 2011 when I was talking to them about how amazing the results
were with our camera and their TS -E lenses. The Info is somehow available but not much recognized as revolutionary !

regards
Stefan
« Last Edit: January 11, 2012, 06:12:14 pm by Stefan.Steib »
Logged
Because Photography is more than Technology and "as we have done it before".

Brian Hirschfeld

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 847
    • Brian Hirschfeld Photography
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2012, 06:16:47 pm »

I have this camera, along with a Canon 24mm TSE among some others, for review, results will start appearing on my Flickr tmrw
Logged
www.brianhirschfeldphotography.com / www.flickr.com/brianhirschfeldphotography
---------------------------------------------------------------
Leica / Nikon / Hasselblad / Mamiya ~ Proud IQ180 owner

uaiomex

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1211
    • http://www.eduardocervantes.com
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #17 on: January 12, 2012, 03:05:27 pm »

If I recall well and the info was right, a few years ago Leica tried to make aspherical elements my molding, but later declared this project as impossible. (at that time)
Eduardo


Eduardo

there is a not so much known fact about the newest Canon Lenses which are (to my knowledge) 17mm TSE, 24mm TSE V2, 8-15mm Fisheye Zoom

They use pressed/molded lenses, allowing aspherical constructions not possible with any other technology. You will see it best when you look into the frontlens
of the 17mm directly from the side. There is a "fingerlike" hole in the back of the frontlens, which could not be made with grinding/polishing traditional technology.
Now this is a very interesting point. It actually means that Canon can do lenses with the exact same focal lenght, focuspoints and calibration data, which means (I believe)
they can do these lenses in automated production, one like the other, like prints made of glass. The only variation will come from mounting in differing barrel parts
(this also means there will be mostly very good lenses, very few bad samples).

This is a technology that stands out and is probably giving them some years of development headroom against the competition, including Zeiss, Schneider and Rodenstock.
I would also think that if they would launch a Pro line (which they are doing now with the cinelenses!!!!) with even better tolerances for the barrels they can reach or surpass
their used sensor resolutions for only a  bit higher cost but with a significantly better margin.

As I may have said before - I admire Japanese engineering - it always is orientated long term, regarding to kaizen AND company strategy. Very, very clever.........

Greetings from Munich
Stefan

 
« Last Edit: January 12, 2012, 03:08:03 pm by uaiomex »
Logged

ErikKaffehr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11311
    • Echophoto
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #18 on: January 12, 2012, 04:42:50 pm »

Hi,

Most japanese zoom lenses use molded aspherics. I got the impression that there are a couple of glass compositions that make molded aspherics possible.

http://www.schott.com/advanced_optics/english/our_products/process_components/lenses/precision_molded.html

Best regards
Erik


If I recall well and the info was right, a few years ago Leica tried to make aspherical elements my molding, but later declared this project as impossible. (at that time)
Eduardo


Logged
Erik Kaffehr
 

Stefan.Steib

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
    • HCam - Hartblei Pro Photography solutions
Re: Canon 24 ts on Hcam vs tecnical cameras with real LF lenses?
« Reply #19 on: January 12, 2012, 04:58:22 pm »

Hi Erik

I knew the link from Schott - the point is the Size and the extremety of curvature that Canon can do (remember the 17mm front lens ! This linked cine lens in my earlier post is probably using even bigger sizes ! ) , Schott defines it limited as follows:

    Lens diameter: 1,5 – 35 mm
    Lens thickness: 0,5 – 10 mm
    Radius of curvature convex: > 3 mm
    Radius of curvature concave: > 5 mm

Which means - Schott cannot do the frontlens of the 17mm TSE. And probably nobody else than Canon.

Regards
Stefan
Logged
Because Photography is more than Technology and "as we have done it before".
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up