The why are you on here?
In retrospect, only Ray seems to have had an informed opinion about Rhein II.
No, I haven't seen Rhein II.
Ray deserves more than your one word dismissal ;-)
to see the work yourself
The one word dismissal was aimed at you because other comments here have expressed informed opinion.
Seems that the Tate owns one, and MOMA owns one -- where are the other 4?
Please do link to those other "informed" opinions.
So you haven't actually seen a Gursky original print at all then ?
At least my comment...
Asked and answered.
Actually you haven't answered, because I asked if you'd seen any Gursky original, not just RheinII, but I assume your answer will still be no.
I asked where are the other 4 prints of Rhein II,
From there you jumped to the conclusion that I haven't seen any Gursky original -- your reasoning is broken, and as a matter of fact wrong.
I asked where are the other 4 prints of Rhein II, so people could follow your injunction to see the work themselves.From there you jumped to the conclusion that I haven't seen any Gursky original -- your reasoning is broken, and as a matter of fact wrong.
So this is what you mean by " hectoring questions, supportive comments, comedic asides, personal anecdotes." I'd say the activities pretty much end after the first one.
... I have sometimes thought he might let go of subjects a bit sooner...
Thanks, Isaac. You confirmed what I said.