Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Lindisfarne  (Read 3623 times)

shaunw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 397
    • Shaun Walby Landscape Photography collections
Lindisfarne
« on: November 05, 2011, 06:37:50 AM »

Shot on overcast windy day last March...the Castle was build around 1550


Lindisfarne Castle 1550 by Shaunwalby Photography, on Flickr
Logged
Canon 5D mk II Sigma 10-20, Canon 17-40mm L, Canon 24-105mm L, Canon 70-200 L, Lee Filters, Manfrotto geared head/tripod.

''Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop''. – Ansel Adams
http://www.shaunwalbyphotography.com

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8878
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2011, 06:32:13 PM »

That is a very powerful composition and post-processing. The foreground can exist almost by itself, without the castle. The only nitpick would be the white halo around the line separating the sky from the middle ground. I would also go for a slightly more menacing sky (darker). In any case, an excellent rendering.

churly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 823
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2011, 07:22:57 AM »

I agree - I really like the composition.  Perhaps I would have pulled up the shadows a bit more but that's just a personal choice.  Well done.
Logged
Chuck Hurich

shaunw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 397
    • Shaun Walby Landscape Photography collections
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2011, 08:38:03 AM »

That is a very powerful composition and post-processing. The foreground can exist almost by itself, without the castle. The only nitpick would be the white halo around the line separating the sky from the middle ground. I would also go for a slightly more menacing sky (darker). In any case, an excellent rendering.

Thanks Slobodan....the halo effect has been a bit of a pain, its is iam pleased to say natural from the sun rather than a processing error, but still distracts from the image i know....i will have a look in PS and see if i can reduce it further

Thanks for crit  Shaun
Logged
Canon 5D mk II Sigma 10-20, Canon 17-40mm L, Canon 24-105mm L, Canon 70-200 L, Lee Filters, Manfrotto geared head/tripod.

''Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop''. – Ansel Adams
http://www.shaunwalbyphotography.com

shaunw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 397
    • Shaun Walby Landscape Photography collections
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2011, 08:40:29 AM »

I agree - I really like the composition.  Perhaps I would have pulled up the shadows a bit more but that's just a personal choice.  Well done.


Thanks Churly...yes i will will have a look at going even darker in the sky

cheers shaun
Logged
Canon 5D mk II Sigma 10-20, Canon 17-40mm L, Canon 24-105mm L, Canon 70-200 L, Lee Filters, Manfrotto geared head/tripod.

''Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop''. – Ansel Adams
http://www.shaunwalbyphotography.com

kikashi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 5120
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2011, 01:12:03 PM »

I think it's a superb shot, showing beautifully how daunting the approach to the castle would have been for potential attackers.

It's a shame the railings are so visible, but there's not much you could reasonably do about that. I'm not sure about darkening the sky any further: it's already only a very little brighter than the ground and you risk making the whole composition unbalanced.

Jeremy
Logged

churly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 823
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2011, 01:41:00 PM »

Sorry, I was unclear.  I wasn't suggesting darkening the sky but rather lightening up the shadows in the left and right mid-ground a bit.
Logged
Chuck Hurich

philipkenney

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2011, 03:27:59 PM »

I think this a great shot! Love the textures and the complexity of midtones. The halo is unfortunate but by no means a downer to the image. I have found that the majority of people never notice those things even though it may eat some of us up inside. Keep up the good work!
Logged

louoates

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 830
    • Lou Oates Photography
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2011, 10:54:12 PM »

I happen to like the fence as a device to lead the eye more easily toward the castle. And I like the sky as-is. Great shot and post.
I should add that the fence is a bit eerie also and it infers that it will protect folks from falling onto the dangerous rocks below.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2011, 10:57:08 PM by louoates »
Logged

shaunw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 397
    • Shaun Walby Landscape Photography collections
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2011, 03:48:51 AM »

I think this a great shot! Love the textures and the complexity of midtones. The halo is unfortunate but by no means a downer to the image. I have found that the majority of people never notice those things even though it may eat some of us up inside. Keep up the good work!

Hi Phil...re the halo effect ..yes sometimes i try to achieve this effect to draw the eye...people see things differently thats for sure...it mildly bugs me (lol)...if i get chance ill see if i can sort it

cheers shaun
Logged
Canon 5D mk II Sigma 10-20, Canon 17-40mm L, Canon 24-105mm L, Canon 70-200 L, Lee Filters, Manfrotto geared head/tripod.

''Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop''. – Ansel Adams
http://www.shaunwalbyphotography.com

shaunw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 397
    • Shaun Walby Landscape Photography collections
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2011, 03:53:55 AM »

I happen to like the fence as a device to lead the eye more easily toward the castle. And I like the sky as-is. Great shot and post.
I should add that the fence is a bit eerie also and it infers that it will protect folks from falling onto the dangerous rocks below.

Hi Lou

A fence seems to split opinion about 70-30 thus far in favour of keep it in......i dont think it ever struck me as needing to go i sort of like it, however i know what people mean.....everything else in the image is natural elements.

Like your thoughts on protectionist element

thanks for feedback
Shaun
Logged
Canon 5D mk II Sigma 10-20, Canon 17-40mm L, Canon 24-105mm L, Canon 70-200 L, Lee Filters, Manfrotto geared head/tripod.

''Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop''. – Ansel Adams
http://www.shaunwalbyphotography.com

shaunw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 397
    • Shaun Walby Landscape Photography collections
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2011, 02:33:56 PM »

Reduced the halo effect around the castle, sky slightly darkened, some rocks slightly lifted....final version ...for now...lol  Shaun


Lindisfarne Castle 1550 by Shaunwalby Photography, on Flickr
Logged
Canon 5D mk II Sigma 10-20, Canon 17-40mm L, Canon 24-105mm L, Canon 70-200 L, Lee Filters, Manfrotto geared head/tripod.

''Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop''. – Ansel Adams
http://www.shaunwalbyphotography.com

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5821
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #12 on: November 07, 2011, 03:09:58 PM »

Nicely done!

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~

My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10687
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #13 on: November 07, 2011, 04:27:27 PM »

Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

EduPerez

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 701
    • Edu Pérez
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #14 on: November 08, 2011, 02:50:26 AM »

A very nice image, I like it a lot! Composition and treatment are both excellent.

For me, this image has two strong focal points: the castle at the background, and the rocks at the immediate foreground; if this image was mine, I would try to make them even stronger. First, the zone of rocks between the foreground and the castle could be a bit darker, and then I would lighten the castle. Just my two cents.
Logged

shaunw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 397
    • Shaun Walby Landscape Photography collections
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #15 on: November 08, 2011, 01:36:35 PM »

Logged
Canon 5D mk II Sigma 10-20, Canon 17-40mm L, Canon 24-105mm L, Canon 70-200 L, Lee Filters, Manfrotto geared head/tripod.

''Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop''. – Ansel Adams
http://www.shaunwalbyphotography.com

shaunw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 397
    • Shaun Walby Landscape Photography collections
Re: Lindisfarne
« Reply #16 on: November 08, 2011, 01:38:47 PM »

A very nice image, I like it a lot! Composition and treatment are both excellent.

For me, this image has two strong focal points: the castle at the background, and the rocks at the immediate foreground; if this image was mine, I would try to make them even stronger. First, the zone of rocks between the foreground and the castle could be a bit darker, and then I would lighten the castle. Just my two cents.

EduPerez...Some good ideas thanks i'll have a look at that.

Regards   Shaun
Logged
Canon 5D mk II Sigma 10-20, Canon 17-40mm L, Canon 24-105mm L, Canon 70-200 L, Lee Filters, Manfrotto geared head/tripod.

''Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop''. – Ansel Adams
http://www.shaunwalbyphotography.com
Pages: [1]   Go Up