I might be wrong, I mean, it has been known, but my understanding is that the guy just offered some sample footage to show how well the camera performed in damn near zero light. He explained that it was too dark to focus and I don't think he did anything more than a rough edit, and I don't recall reading anywhere that he claimed it was a finished sequence from a longer movie, let alone great art.
And yet people are choosing to criticise his artistic ability. Do we know, from what little he offered, whether he had a good script? Do we know how that sequence, once edited with whatever post, would fit into a script? Have we seen enough of his movie to say its crap? Think on it guys, why the feeding frenzy on his artistic soul when all he did was say, hey, these shots are pretty good for just a bit of moonlight and a couple of car headlights? Sometimes I just don't get what the Internet does to our standards of behaviour.