Please excuse a topic that comes up a lot, but I could still use a bit of advice. My 4900 prints come out very dark. I am using the Epson 4900 paper profiles (have tried several different Epson papers), and monitor calibrated to print. The key thing is that I do get what I see on the monitor, and in the print preview. Again, everything matches great. It is just that the printer is too dark, and this takes a lot of rework in Photoshop to get a usable print. Once corrected, the prints are amazing, and I have gotten lots of compliments. However, this is very time consuming. On my previous HP dye ink printer, if I was short of time or just lazy, I could simply dump the files to the printer and live with what was output. On the 4900, each print takes lots of work, not just a gamma correction. I typically have to bump gamma, curves, brightness, and shadows - everything possible. I am using a variety of cameras, but primarily Olympus E-PL1/E-PM1. The histograms and output of camera looks fine on camera and windows preview. All of these data points have led me to the conclusion that the printer is simply very dark. I realize that the dynamic range of the printer is much less than the camera, and work is needed to optimize a print. However, I still think I must be doing something very wrong here
Some details: Windows PC, XP, CS5.1, Epson 4900, Dell monitor, Monitor profile used, Epson paper profile used, have tried Exhibition Fiber, Premium Luster, Whole sample pack of various cold/hot press, letting "printer manage colors". Print preview very accurately matches output of printer.