Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Completely new camera technology  (Read 19927 times)

jeremypayne

  • Guest
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #20 on: October 12, 2011, 07:06:20 pm »

I'm sorry, ...no offense meant, but there is no such thing as "digital" lenses

Sorry, dude ... but you are YET AGAIN completely wrong.

A lens with its own CPU and firmware can most certainly be described as a digital lens.

Please stop posting nonsense ... it is getting really tiresome.
Logged

fotometria gr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 568
    • www.fotometria.gr
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #21 on: October 13, 2011, 04:14:19 am »

Sorry, dude ... but you are YET AGAIN completely wrong.

A lens with its own CPU and firmware can most certainly be described as a digital lens.

Please stop posting nonsense ... it is getting really tiresome.
Sorry, dude... a lens can only be glass and CPUs have nothing to do with glass, Its complete nonsense to try to overcome physics by playing with words, my Leica R and F100 cameras have CPU and firmware as well does this makes them .....digital?  ;D Please keep your nonsense away from me.  ;) Cheers, Theodoros. www.fotometria.gr
Logged

PierreVandevenne

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 512
    • http://www.datarescue.com/life
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #22 on: October 13, 2011, 06:41:51 pm »

This is a lens

http://www.xrayoptic.ru/images/lens_gen5.jpg

This is also a lens

http://www.imt.kit.edu/img/roeoptik5.gif

and this is a lens

http://daveyoder.com/search4davinci/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Smither-006.jpg

and can you guess what this is?

http://www.rpi.edu/news/image/pr092208-hirsa.jpg

So if you want to contest the meaning of commonly used terms, feel free to do so, but try to avoid too generic statements.

While your smileys imply κωμῳδία, your behaviour leads to τραγῳδία
Logged

fotometria gr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 568
    • www.fotometria.gr
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #23 on: October 13, 2011, 06:59:00 pm »

This is a lens

http://www.xrayoptic.ru/images/lens_gen5.jpg

This is also a lens

http://www.imt.kit.edu/img/roeoptik5.gif

and this is a lens

http://daveyoder.com/search4davinci/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Smither-006.jpg

and can you guess what this is?

http://www.rpi.edu/news/image/pr092208-hirsa.jpg

So if you want to contest the meaning of commonly used terms, feel free to do so, but try to avoid too generic statements.

While your smileys imply κωμῳδία, your behaviour leads to τραγῳδία
And all these lenses have to do with photography are they?  ::) Now we can really play with words...., it's surely κωμωδία that leads to τραγωδία!
Logged

fotometria gr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 568
    • www.fotometria.gr
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #24 on: October 13, 2011, 07:08:24 pm »

Ah! Forgot to add, obviously there are people who think that because a microscope is an instrument, it can replace a ...guitar that is also an instrument! Great logic! Regards, Theodoros. www.fotometria.gr
Logged

PierreVandevenne

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 512
    • http://www.datarescue.com/life
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #25 on: October 13, 2011, 07:12:15 pm »

Some of them do. The last one could be said to be in the generic following class

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=liquid+lens+cameras

Then, of course, if you wait long enough, say 100 millions of years, you could argue that glass is actually a fluid.
Logged

fotometria gr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 568
    • www.fotometria.gr
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #26 on: October 13, 2011, 07:54:49 pm »

Some of them do. The last one could be said to be in the generic following class

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=liquid+lens+cameras

Then, of course, if you wait long enough, say 100 millions of years, you could argue that glass is actually a fluid.
But it is a fluid... This doesn't make it water... does it? But then again you can see through both... Ah! I got it! You mean that Galileo Galilei became blind because he was looking to the sun through a fluid! Regards, Theodoros. www.fotometria.gr
 P.S.You see! I didn't argue at all, it did take me 100 million years to reach nirvana.... 8)
Logged

Gemmtech

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 526
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #27 on: October 16, 2011, 07:58:50 am »

It can be argued glass is a solid or a fluid, that discussion is very old.
Logged

viewfinder

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 124
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #28 on: October 17, 2011, 04:24:59 pm »

Not quite what's being disscussed here but an interestig comparison of where future technology may take photography;...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Th5zlUe6gOE
Logged

Fine_Art

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1172
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #29 on: October 19, 2011, 05:47:54 pm »

Logged

edwinb

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 147
    • http://www.image2output.com
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #30 on: October 20, 2011, 03:46:51 pm »

so does anyone know what the effective resolution of this is?

edwin
Logged
Edwin Blenkinsopp
Technical Manager
image2output
m:  +44 (0) 7836 674749
e: edwin@image2output.com
w: Sinar |  Foba |Inkjet

Johnny_Johnson

  • Guest
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #31 on: October 20, 2011, 05:03:55 pm »

0.5Mp, 720 x 720 according to Thom Hogan's guess.

Cya,
Johnny
Logged

Fine_Art

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1172
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #32 on: October 20, 2011, 05:38:29 pm »

The CEO said 1080 vertical at least.
Logged

LesPalenik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5339
    • advantica blog
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #33 on: October 21, 2011, 02:06:52 am »

When the Lytro gets it to a usable resolution, and you can output from one capture a stack of JPG images with a different focus, you could feed them into a focus stacker and get a really sharp image throughout. That would be a nice and very practical application.
 
Logged

EgillBjarki

  • Guest
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #34 on: October 21, 2011, 12:54:43 pm »

I think this is a interesting new toy, but the technology that is VERY interesting. I just hope we will not see another FOVEON case, I hope to see this in the big camera makers products soon, working its way to the top professional cameras. The thought of this in a big resolution raw format camera is very attractive.
Logged

allegretto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 660
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #35 on: October 26, 2011, 01:13:10 pm »

I'm sorry, ...no offense meant, but there is no such thing as "digital" lenses, "Digital" as a word of promoting, is used from the industry to trick consumers that the resolution is higher and can cope with  the "much better" digital sensors. It has been done before with "digital speakers" (not the ones with active amps on them) "digitally remastered" (you know.. the ones that cropped the frequencies with the noise) and elsewhere...., you 'll find many not "digital" lenses that are more "digital" than the "digital" equivalents (take my Zeiss for Contax645 for example). Regards, Theodoros. www.fotometria.gr

actually this does appear to be an image composed of multiple digital sub-images. digital summation by definition

so I think the nomenclature is appropriate, unlike much of the examples you correctly cite.
Logged

hjulenissen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2051
Re: Completely new camera technology
« Reply #36 on: October 26, 2011, 01:39:22 pm »

That is a ridiculous assumption. A true professional uses post-processing as finishing tool, nothing more. The vast majority of work comes before the shutter is event tripped, not after we return to the office.
I find this strange. Most "professionals" that I know in any trade tend to economize their time and equipment, focusing on great end-results, as that is what pays the bill. For some that may mean spending a lot of time in the field, for others it may mean spending more time in front of a PC.

I think it is usually amateurs (like myself) who can afford to do their hobby exactly how they like, independent of end-results.

-h
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up