Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Untitled  (Read 10084 times)

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 696
Untitled
« on: August 25, 2011, 03:27:13 PM »

Your thoughts please?
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8902
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Untitled
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2011, 03:32:44 PM »

Very nice.

Classical composition, calming, muted colors, good use of foreground, good balance between shadows and highlights (i.e., shadows not opened too much).

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 696
Re: Untitled
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2011, 01:35:52 AM »

Thank you Slobodan.
Logged

Heinz

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 70
Re: Untitled
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2011, 04:12:42 PM »

Howzit Boet,

Not too keen on the buildings in the pic. Maybe flatten them with a bulldozer or just clone them out with photoshop.  ;D
Logged

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 696
Re: Untitled
« Reply #4 on: August 27, 2011, 01:01:02 AM »

Hello Heinz

Yeah, I would love to flatten those buildings..them and the huge power lines towards the left makes compositions difficult from this spot.
Logged

William Walker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 655
    • William Walker Landscapes
Re: Untitled
« Reply #5 on: August 27, 2011, 05:44:59 AM »

Howzit Boet,

Not too keen on the buildings in the pic. Maybe flatten them with a bulldozer or just clone them out with photoshop.  ;D

Hand of Man?

The composition reminds me of a Timo Lofgren picture, so that would make it a compliment!

William

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7880
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Untitled
« Reply #6 on: September 24, 2011, 10:47:56 AM »

Exactly! The hand of man always is what makes good landscape.

popnfresh

  • Guest
Re: Untitled
« Reply #7 on: September 24, 2011, 02:58:06 PM »

Exactly! The hand of man always is what makes good landscape.

I guess that makes the majority of Ansel Adams' landscapes crap.
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7880
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Untitled
« Reply #8 on: September 24, 2011, 03:46:41 PM »

You said that, Pop, not me. But I do think a lot of Ansel's stuff would have been better with the hand of man included. If you want to do great landscape you can do worse than to learn from Turner and Constable.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2011, 03:48:58 PM by RSL »
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10708
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Untitled
« Reply #9 on: September 24, 2011, 06:08:57 PM »

Exactly! The hand of man always is what makes good landscape.
::)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8902
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Untitled
« Reply #10 on: September 24, 2011, 06:25:02 PM »

Exactly! The hand of man always is what makes good landscape.

You know, Russ, I was about to comment about your comment, but then I realized that you and Eric are now closely watching what I post and measure it against your newly instituted snide-o-meter... so I'll pass ;D

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7880
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Untitled
« Reply #11 on: September 24, 2011, 08:05:59 PM »

Watch it, Slobodan. Michael's likely to lock the thread if you talk like that.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10708
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Untitled
« Reply #12 on: September 24, 2011, 11:53:59 PM »

You know, Russ, I was about to comment about your comment, but then I realized that you and Eric are now closely watching what I post and measure it against your newly instituted snide-o-meter... so I'll pass ;D
Slobodan, I consider Russ's latest comment about "the hand of man" to be an excellent example of a snide comment (unlike this one).

Eric

__________ <= (space for inserting your own choice of smiley)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10708
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Untitled
« Reply #13 on: September 24, 2011, 11:57:43 PM »

Riaan,

First, let me apologize for taking your thread off topic.

Next, let me say I like your photo. The grasses are very sensuous and the human artifacts are small enough that they don't bother me (but if it were my image, I would probably remove them, especially if I were planning to show it to Russ).

Eric
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

BlasR

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 760
    • http://BMRWorldPhotos.com
Re: Untitled
« Reply #14 on: September 25, 2011, 08:11:30 AM »

Riaan,

Eric, always looking for a fight, he became a mad man, so I am with you.  Lets fight back ;D

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 696
Re: Untitled
« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2011, 03:35:53 PM »

Riaan,

First, let me apologize for taking your thread off topic.

Eric

Not to worry Eric, it's what makes LuLa special for me- the stables here are full of horses called " Tangent"
Logged

JohnKoerner

  • Guest
Re: Untitled
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2011, 07:12:09 PM »

Well, since everyone seems to be pussy-footing around making any snide remarks here, allow me to take the bait:



Exactly! The hand of man always is what makes good landscape.

Rubbish. The truth is, any evidence of man in a landscape ruins it. The only tolerable evidence of man would be in a cityscape ... where buildings, skyscrapers, city lights, etc. are the main focus ... or perhaps a farmscape where the "peaceful farm" is the story. Those are totally different genres IMO.

But in a straight landscape shot (note the word "land"), any evidence of man is an automatic delete of the file (unless it is minor enough to where it can be "healed" out of the final image).




__________________________
__________________________




I guess that makes the majority of Ansel Adams' landscapes crap.
You said that, Pop, not me. But I do think a lot of Ansel's stuff would have been better with the hand of man included. If you want to do great landscape you can do worse than to learn from Turner and Constable.

Correction: that's exactly what you said, Russ (well, you implied it, technically). In fact, you went on to confirm your implication by stating how Ansel's work would have been better with "the hand of man" in there, as if you're in a position to judge one of the great masters of the genre. No disrespect, Russ, but judging by your last effort at a landscape, I seriously doubt your qualifications to judge anyone's landscape work, let alone that of Ansel Adams.

Stick to street stuff, Russ, because you're very good at that ;)

Jack



.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2011, 07:14:27 PM by John Koerner »
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7880
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Untitled
« Reply #17 on: September 25, 2011, 07:47:36 PM »

Rubbish. The truth is, any evidence of man in a landscape ruins it. The only tolerable evidence of man would be in a cityscape ... where buildings, skyscrapers, city lights, etc. are the main focus ... or perhaps a farmscape where the "peaceful farm" is the story. Those are totally different genres IMO.

Well! Here we go!

Jack, have you ever gone to a museum and stood in front of one of Turner's masterpiece landscapes? Try it some time. It may change your attitude toward landscape. If you can't find a Turner, try a Constable or a Thomas Cole, or an Albert Bierstadt. These guys understood what landscape should be. Ansel's all-time greatest photograph was "Woman Behind Screen Door, Independence, California." Bet you've never seen it.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10708
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Untitled
« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2011, 09:51:56 PM »

See? I don't need to make snide remarks. I can count on my serfs and minions to make them for me.

Thank you, Jack!

Eric
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

kikashi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5129
Re: Untitled
« Reply #19 on: September 26, 2011, 02:57:36 AM »

Rubbish. The truth is, any evidence of man in a landscape ruins it. The only tolerable evidence of man would be in a cityscape ... where buildings, skyscrapers, city lights, etc. are the main focus ... or perhaps a farmscape where the "peaceful farm" is the story. Those are totally different genres IMO.
Since you start pithily (not snidely), Jack, so will I: drivel.

Don't try to ply the trade in England, if that's what you believe, or France or Italy or any other moderately densely populated country where the landscape has been formed, over hundreds of years, by man. Are you seriously suggesting that, for example, Michael's wonderful photos of the Palouse are not "landscape" because they show crop fields?

To suggest that only virgin landscapes such as the American south west are the only places where landscape photographers can take photographs makes no sense at all.

Jeremy
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up