Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Drive By Shooting  (Read 1591 times)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Drive By Shooting
« on: June 27, 2011, 04:28:05 pm »

On a roll, baby, on a roll!

Rob C

John Camp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2171
Re: Drive By Shooting
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2011, 06:43:33 pm »

I would be interested in Michael's take on the G3. Same as the GH2, give or take a little?
Logged

michael

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5084
Re: Drive By Shooting
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2011, 07:36:17 pm »

That's a good summary. Smaller, lighter, less manual controls, no manual video controls.

Not a replacement for the GH2 by any means, but a less expensive alternative. Better IQ than any other M43 than the GH2.

Michael
Logged

Pelao

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
Re: Drive By Shooting
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2011, 08:58:42 pm »

Yes, that photograph is a good catch.

I wonder how close to the  G3 is to the GH2 in terms of still quality? From what I have read and seen there is not much in it, but I suppose we will only really know when RAW samples have been compared.

The one weakness with my GF1 has been the VF. The G3 has fewer manual controls (but two programmable Fn buttons) and a nice built-in VF. Looking forward to the field report.
Logged

bobtowery

  • Antarctica 2016
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 244
    • http://bobtowery.typepad.com
Re: Drive By Shooting
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2011, 03:56:14 pm »

Arresting image!
Logged
Bob
 ht
Pages: [1]   Go Up