Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Masters of The Intimate Landscape  (Read 3047 times)

Johnphoto

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38
Masters of The Intimate Landscape
« on: June 16, 2011, 10:38:48 am »

I have always been inspired by the photography by Eliot Porter. His interpretations of the intimate landscape is still my bench mark in landscape photography. Now, I just recently discovered the work by swedish photographer Hans Strand and I must say, he is at the same level. Simply fantastic! http://www.hansstrand.com/Hans_Strand/Intimate_Landscapes_12.html
Logged

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5824
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Masters of The Intimate Landscape
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2011, 02:12:43 pm »

Thanks for sharing the link!

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned t

Justan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1928
    • Justan-Elk.com
Re: Masters of The Intimate Landscape
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2011, 12:31:52 am »

^what he wrote^

Delightful

bill t.

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3011
    • http://www.unit16.net
Re: Masters of The Intimate Landscape
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2011, 12:58:02 am »

Yes gorgeous work, as good as it gets!

I wonder what Eliot Porter's work would have been like in the digital age?  In looking at a collection of his dye transfers recently I was reminded how digital has widened the range of photo-interpretable subjects.  In his day Eliot would have had to chose from a much more limited set of subjects and lighting conditions that were friendly to the characteristics of his film and print-making technology.

Digital would certainly have released a lot of those constraints, but then the question is...would that have been to the better?  Constraints can give you a kind of freedom by letting you get to work in space your are not required to struggle out of.  To what extent was Eliot defined by the limitations of his media?  Would larger possibilities have helped or hindered his art?  But I wander, as usual.
Logged

Hassyman

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15
Re: Masters of The Intimate Landscape
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2011, 06:11:07 am »

Great that you found the work by Hans Strand. He has become my House God since a few months back in time. I am a great admirer of Eliot Porter as well. I also like the question, what would have happened if Porter would have had access to the digital world? Probably he would have made 4 times more images and with better colors? On the other hand the old colors gave his work personality.
Logged

Johnphoto

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38
Re: Masters of The Intimate Landscape
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2011, 06:23:15 am »

Yes, Porter´s work would probably have had better colors and shadow detail. However perfect is not always perfect. There is some kind of magic in the old photographs. What I like with Hans Strand, is that his work is not over the top, like too many contemporary digital post processing magicians are.
Logged

2jbourret

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 144
    • http://jamesbourret.photoshelter.com
Re: Masters of The Intimate Landscape
« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2011, 01:05:45 am »

Strand is indeed a master, truly inspiring. It is surprising that his work is not better known here in the US. The aerial abstracts of the braided river beds are simply amazing!
Logged
Jamie Bourret
[url=http://jamesbourret.p

Hassyman

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15
Logged

EduPerez

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 700
    • Edu Pérez
Re: Masters of The Intimate Landscape
« Reply #8 on: June 20, 2011, 02:08:14 am »

Bookmarked, many thanks!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up