is the Nokton really better than the Canon 50 1.4 (which is not very good wide open but pretty nice at 2.8 and great f4 - f8) ? and is it worth the loss of autofocus? i think photozone.de may have a test
i have the voigtlander 20 which is not very good wide open - not unreasonable for a pancake lens
Stever
I got the impression that Photozone thought that the Nokton had the edge optically.
I like the idea of:
the slightly longer focal length ( it's a sweet spot for me )
It's probably going to be better built than the Canon ( i don't have a lot of faith in the build quality of their ' mid range' gear ).
The lack of auto focus isn't an issue, I'll be using live view ( it's also one less thing to go wrong ).
I'm also kind of intrigued by the thing.
And if I really wanted to save pennies I'd get one of the 50mm 1.8 plastic wonders - sharp, but I've already had one die on me and the 'focus ring' is a joke.
Thanks for your input.
Graeme