Trouble is, you replied rudely to a very polite question in that very thread. Now come on, Jeff, ya gotta admit, that’s funny!
Did you bother to read the the posts? D_Clear asked a basic question...I answered it...he asked another question...I told him to read the manual (albeit with short hand) and come back with his questions. Was he offended? I have no idea...he hasn't been back so that means he's either offended or the manual did indeed answer his questions.
You see the delicious irony in this situation?
First stamper says: "
I have noticed that on the thread Photokit Sharpener 2 he is the model of decorum, good manners and humour, polite, and every other nice adjective I can think about."
Then you say: "
Trouble is, you replied rudely to a very polite question in that very thread."
If it turns out that D_Clear was offended by my answer, I will apologize to D_Clear because my intent was simply to use short hand.
The fact that a few here on LuLa are trying to pounce on everything I write to try to cast me in a negative light is, I think pretty obvious. You and me Dean are never gonna be friends...the precipitating event of my dislike for you was your post
Shills in the House?. Every engagement since then you've tried to cover your ass and lash out at others (primarily me) and have followed me through several threads now taking shots. The last thread was
Photoshop Alternatives. You fanned flames there as well even though it was Justinr who took it over the top and provoked Michael's closing of the thread.
So, again, are you gonna keep stalking me through various threads here on LuLa and try to pick verbal fights? I'm willing to keep going toe to toe with you bud...is this really how you want to spend your time here on LuLa? Really? You ain't gonna win bud, cause I don't back down. This is really casting a light on you, not me.