Dick
I quote you from another thread -
"John (or anyone). I am fairly new to this forum but have commented on several posts, mostly favourably.
However, I have a question. My last post, Upper Gap Bay of Quinte, is just 3 slots below this one. It has been viewed 58 time but no one has commented. So my question is " What am I doing wrong?"
I post a link rather than the image itself because my hosting service Zenfolio makes that so easy to do. Is that a problem? Also if my picture has problems I would appreciate any advice. That is why I posted it, to learn and improve.
I also find LuLa the most interesting of the sites I visit as most of the regulars do speak their minds and that is refreshing.
Cheers
Dick K."
I don't think you are doing anything wrong, although posting a link rather than the picture itself doesn't help. We really need the immediacy of the photo on this page to jolt us into action. And some sites people link to (like Flickr) are blocked for me on our corporate system.
If no-one comments on a picture posted here, it usually means it just doesn't move them very much. They don't love it, they don't hate it. If a photo is really awful the folks here are very kind and will usually diplomatically say nothing. It quite often happens to me that something I post gets no response at all. Zero, nada. In that case I just let it quietly sink out of sight, and at least I learned that it's probably not one of my best. Or, more likely, that it is something which means a lot to me personally but not that much to anyone else. No harm done, and no wounds which won't heal.
In your case, I thought the picture was quite pleasant, certainly not awful, but it didn't press my buttons in any strong sort of way. So I didn't post a comment. I don't tend to comment much on colour photography anyway, because I don't work in colour usually and I find it very hard to judge.
So don't worry too much Dick, just keep on posting 'em.
John