Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: 645D vs 5Dmk2  (Read 12093 times)

mhecker*

  • Contributor
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 93
    • http://www.wyofoto.com
645D vs 5Dmk2
« on: January 19, 2011, 04:28:07 pm »

I've done some initial testing indoors with my 645D vs 5Dmk2

Halogen lighting, still life, ISO 100  RAW

5dmk2, 100mm macro lens @ f8 live view manual focus
645D, 120mm macro lens @ f11  autofocus

The focus point was just above Grants ear.

After capture colorbalance in LR, no sharpening.
Sharpening in CS5 5D shot USM 350,0.4,1   645D USM 250,0.4,1

A little more sharpening on 5Dmk2 because of its AA filter

Links.

5Dmk2  http://wyofoto.com/Pentax_645D/5Dmk2_Still_Life.jpg
645D    http://wyofoto.com/Pentax_645D/645D_Still_Life.jpg

Warning big files 5DMk2 is 16MB,  645D file is 32MB
Additional warning 645D file will set off CS5 counterfit alarm. You must view it in browser or Lightroom 3.0

Enjoy....  
« Last Edit: January 19, 2011, 04:35:25 pm by mhecker* »
Logged

MrSmith

  • Guest
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2011, 04:59:41 pm »

some blocky noise in the blacks with the 5dII. if you shoot at 160 asa instead of 100 it should disappear.
Logged

kers

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4389
    • Pieter Kers
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2011, 06:16:15 pm »

My program cs5 photoshop tells me it will not display banknotes...?!!!!  ( and I am sure only dollars are the problem)
What the Heck !

Now I know why Photoshop is so slow...

next thing will be naked women( men, and especially children)

and as always violence is not a problem ...
« Last Edit: January 19, 2011, 06:19:08 pm by kers »
Logged
Pieter Kers
www.beeld.nu/la

mhecker*

  • Contributor
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 93
    • http://www.wyofoto.com
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2011, 07:40:45 pm »

You can download the GNU open source GIMP photo editor program for free and it will read both files......   :o
Logged

uaiomex

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1211
    • http://www.eduardocervantes.com
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2011, 08:47:00 pm »

Why only with the 645D file? Really curious
Ed
Logged

tho_mas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1799
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2011, 08:51:06 pm »

Why only with the 645D file? Really curious
the 5d2 file is too soft  ;D
Logged

uaiomex

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1211
    • http://www.eduardocervantes.com
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2011, 09:02:58 pm »

I resized the 5D2 file too. I share these comments to the full. The 645D sensor is only 1.6 times bigger. Not enough really to make a difference. I think is the pixel count that makes most of the difference. I can see more difference from aps to full-frame which is twice as big.
I've said before (from a lot of personal brainstorming) that for me, digital medium format starts at 48X36, which is twice as big. Doubling the sensor size is the minimum requirement for all the hassle and expense of jumping to a bigger format.
This comparison affirms my belief. Thanks for sharing.
Eduardo

PS A good one tho-mas!  :D

What's interesting is upsizing the 5DII file to match the 645D file and viewing both side by side, sure the 645D is crisper, no argument, but it goes to show how small of a difference there is between a $2500 camera and a $10K camera which has twice the resolution.

In prints, at normal viewing distances, I wouldn't really worry too much about using the Canon. That may piss some people off, but if it costs 4x to get "a little better", most people should just worry about great content, great images and save a few bucks.

Thanks for posting. It will be a contentious debate I'm sure.
Logged

RobertJ

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 706
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2011, 10:06:51 pm »

The Pentax needs better optics, IMO.

If the Canon was shot with a Zeiss ZE 100mm, it might be even better, even though both 100mm Canon macro lenses are pretty darn good already.   
« Last Edit: January 19, 2011, 10:11:43 pm by T-1000 »
Logged

ced

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 287
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2011, 04:56:53 am »

mhecker thanks for sharing, are you able to do the same with a landscape comparison and upload the files too?
without taking price into consideration the canon looks like a point & shoot next to the pentax and I am not a fan of either...
Logged

ndevlin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 679
    • Follow me on Twitter
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2011, 10:43:56 am »


What I find most interesting about this comparison is the range of opinions on the files, showing that much of the never-ending debate is a product of teh divergent meaning of "good" and "good enough" amongst fair-minded, experienced photographers.

Me, I see two excellent files, one of which has an enormous advantage in detail.

Good times all around.

- N.

ps. The detail in the bill on the 645D file shows in graphic form why PS, and a lot of devices like high-end copiers, have algorithms which detect and prevent the reproduction of actual currency. These tools have become so good that counterfeiters were using them extensively. You might laugh, but this is actually a pretty serious issue.
Logged
Nick Devlin   @onelittlecamera        ww

mhecker*

  • Contributor
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 93
    • http://www.wyofoto.com
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2011, 10:44:46 am »

I will be heading to Yosemite with David Brookover on Jan 27.

We will do an in the field shootout with his D3x, and my 645D and 5Dmk2.
I will eventually publish the results online.
Full size comparison jpegs will be made available online.

I think it very interesting how different people look at the same two images here and see very different things.
Perhaps IQ ultimately is in the eye of the beholder.   :)
Logged

ErikKaffehr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11311
    • Echophoto
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2011, 11:37:27 pm »

Hi,

Here is my 'standard comparison'. Both images cropped (so photoshop doesn't complain about forged bill). the crop resized to 40cm width at 240 PPI, corresponding to a print about 129 cm wide. The second screen dump has some extra sharpening applied on the Canon image.

The Pentax has significantly better detail. Check Grant's rig eye. Pentax resolves nicely while Canon "invents" fake detail.

I'd like to thank Miles for publishing a good comparison! Will be nice to hear how things worked in the field and with additional lenses.

Check also this (and click on images fora actual pixel view, please!): http://echophoto.dnsalias.net/ekr/index.php/photoarticles/51-a-closer-look-at-pentax-645d-image-quality

Best regards
Erik


I've done some initial testing indoors with my 645D vs 5Dmk2

Halogen lighting, still life, ISO 100  RAW

5dmk2, 100mm macro lens @ f8 live view manual focus
645D, 120mm macro lens @ f11  autofocus

The focus point was just above Grants ear.

After capture colorbalance in LR, no sharpening.
Sharpening in CS5 5D shot USM 350,0.4,1   645D USM 250,0.4,1

A little more sharpening on 5Dmk2 because of its AA filter

Links.

5Dmk2  http://wyofoto.com/Pentax_645D/5Dmk2_Still_Life.jpg
645D    http://wyofoto.com/Pentax_645D/645D_Still_Life.jpg

Warning big files 5DMk2 is 16MB,  645D file is 32MB
Additional warning 645D file will set off CS5 counterfit alarm. You must view it in browser or Lightroom 3.0

Enjoy....  
« Last Edit: January 20, 2011, 11:50:46 pm by ErikKaffehr »
Logged
Erik Kaffehr
 

paul_jones

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 574
    • http://www.paulrossjones.com
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2011, 12:38:28 am »

the up-ressed file of the 5d is close to collapse, i doubt i would give my client that 5d file. a fairer comparison is keep up-ressing untill the best of the bunch is starting to look like a bad orange peal filter, then look at the worst at that same range. i think you will find the 5d completely unusable.

ive used 5d and 1dsmk3 files a lot, and at most uses its ok. but if you get forced to crop significantly, medium format can save your ass.

paul
Logged
check my new website
[url=http://www.pau

ErikKaffehr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11311
    • Echophoto
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2011, 12:52:37 am »

Hi,

The difference would be much less obvious in print.

It's quite clear that P645D resolves some detail where the Canon creates fake detail due, possibly due to aliasing. Another factor may be that both images are enlarged from JPEG, the Canon much more enlarged than the Pentax. Some of the false detail may come from JPEG and not the image it self.

I would say that it is fully expected that the Pentax has better resolution than the Canon. It also seems that the lens tested is good enough, at the center.

I hope that Miles also will publish some nature shots and share his experiences about working in the field with the Pentax 645D. Also I'm glad that Miles found a digital camera for all his Pentax 645 lenses. I'm not really sure about where Pentax is going. Will they develop a new lens line for the P645D or is it just intended for owners of existing P45 lenses? Will they make an adapter for Pentax 67 lenses.

Best regards
Erik


the up-ressed file of the 5d is close to collapse, i doubt i would give my client that 5d file. a fairer comparison is keep up-ressing untill the best of the bunch is starting to look like a bad orange peal filter, then look at the worst at that same range. i think you will find the 5d completely unusable.

ive used 5d and 1dsmk3 files a lot, and at most uses its ok. but if you get forced to crop significantly, medium format can save your ass.

paul
Logged
Erik Kaffehr
 

Leping

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 87
    • http://www.lepingzha.com
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #14 on: January 21, 2011, 01:22:31 am »

The Pentax has significantly better detail. Check Grant's rig eye. Pentax resolves nicely while Canon "invents" fake detail.

Even the both lenses only resolve to the same total amount of details (i.e., the 645D lens does not reach the sensor resolution limit), MF files are still greatly preferable, with their better tonality and smoother color transitions.  Much less Bayer demosiacing artifacts too for very sure, and less noise.

Thanks for Erik's work -- you can see not only the 5DII file "one the edge of breaking down", it contains vast amount of artifacts.  For one, all the fine details are artificially increased in size, an effect I often call "line thickening".  It is not usually not very noticeable, until you see a MF shoot, or the real object to realize.  Look again and look close.  The cold hard fact is Bayer sensors need 4 pixel square per resolved element to really do a great job.  So, more pixels is always better, even when the lenses are not up to the task (of ultimate resolution).
« Last Edit: January 21, 2011, 01:25:25 am by Leping »
Logged
Leping Zha
www.lepingzha.com leping@att.

ndevlin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 679
    • Follow me on Twitter
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2011, 09:42:51 am »

I'm not really sure about where Pentax is going. Will they develop a new lens line for the P645D or is it just intended for owners of existing P45 lenses? Will they make an adapter for Pentax 67 lenses.
Erik

Pentax already makes an adapter for the 67 lenses, which works just fine, as do the lenses. They are huge and hard to focus and offer no obvious advantages over the 645 glass.

The company's level of commitment to the system is the real question. Pentax has been for sale for ages, and the 645D will no doubt give the financials a much needed up-swing. But wither the 645D? Or whither the 645D?

This system could be a real winner and money make for Pentax, if the right corporate leadership get behind it. They have built the best MF camera body to date, and excited many segments of the market.  If we see a couple of new lenses in the next year, things bode well.  But who knows. 

Then again, I don't think that the continued existence of any of the other MF companies is at all a certainty, either.

A lot of pros are still perfectly happy with their P30s and H2's with 39MP backs.  Similarly, the 645D could make me happy in a lot of my work for a lot of years to come, by which time the second or third "next thing" will have come along.  So perhaps it doesn't matter.

- N.
Logged
Nick Devlin   @onelittlecamera        ww

tsjanik

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 720
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2011, 11:06:33 am »

Pentax already makes an adapter for the 67 lenses, which works just fine, as do the lenses. They are huge and hard to focus and offer no obvious advantages over the 645 glass.
True in general; however,  the 67 90mm and 105mm are small, fill a gap in the 645 offerings, and appear to work well on the 645D.  Also, there is no 645 lens equivalent to the 400mm f/4 ED or 800mm f/5.6 ED.

The company's level of commitment to the system is the real question. Pentax has been for sale for ages, and the 645D will no doubt give the financials a much needed up-swing. But wither the 645D? Or whither the 645D?

This system could be a real winner and money make for Pentax, if the right corporate leadership get behind it. They have built the best MF camera body to date, and excited many segments of the market.  If we see a couple of new lenses in the next year, things bode well.  But who knows....... 


That's my concern with this camera.  If Pentax had to be sold, I wish it had been to Samsung or Panasonic or even Sony.  Companies that appear to have a real commitment to cameras.  Everything I‘ve seen (admittedly little), implies that Hoya considers the camera division of Pentax to be something of an albatross.
Logged

DeeJay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 250
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2011, 11:11:02 am »

What Pentax need to sort out quick smart is the ability to tether. I think the omission of this is a monumental cock up, they could have had great leverage at release with some extra thought.

it makes it a total non option for me.
Logged

bcooter

  • Guest
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2011, 11:26:22 am »



A lot of pros are still perfectly happy with their P30s and H2's with 39MP backs.  Similarly, the 645D could make me happy in a lot of my work for a lot of years to come, by which time the second or third "next thing" will have come along.  So perhaps it doesn't matter.

- N.



Professional or not you buy cameras for a reason.  Have to . . . want to, but still a reason.

To me if a camera has a fixed prism it's a strike down in usability, or better put if an expensive camera doesn't have view point options and a fixed prism it's too much like a  d3x or a 5d2, regardless of perfect conditions image quality.   

I recently used my 5d2 for an 16 page spread and I had never used our 5d2 for anything but motion.   It's a plastic lump, but it shoots fine, actually shoots more than fine. It has all the romance and tactile feel of a hair dryer, but it worked and had we shipped our contax' to the shoot I never would have used it for stills, but it worked fine.

A lot of people got excited early on with the Pentax, partly because the medium format world finally produced a camera with a decent lcd and an in camera preview that was usable, uh oh yea and the cost of around 10 grand.

But that excitement faded when the tethering options were limited and the lens line seems to be listed a TBD.   So when you think about it, saving a few thousand on a pentax vs. a hasselblad, seems like a somewhat adventurous notion.

Regardless I believe with all my heart that the days of traditional cameras with any prism are numbered.  Forget about brands, formats, this will do more to change things than anything else.



We just shot 10 days straight with the RED One.  The camera is a monster, (a good monster, but still a monster), but the lcd and that articulating arm is a work of art.

You can manually track focus, zoom in live focus and it works.   We sometimes mount two to the camera, one at waist level, one at a higher view point and you can go from both views in an instant.   

We shot in bright sun, low light, high light, back light and never once thought about the viewfinder.  It's just important to set your exposure at a proper eye angle, but after that your good to go.

Wait until this type of lcd has touch autofocus and tracking and then the camera becomes a box, the viewfinder becomes a screen and then the days of optical prisms are over.  It may take some time, but I know this is the future.

IMO

BC
Logged

ndevlin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 679
    • Follow me on Twitter
Re: 645D vs 5Dmk2
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2011, 01:53:09 pm »


The 645D is irritatingly close to just-right. It has an HDMI port, which can drive the exact sort of external monitor you show above. With a live image to that from the sensor, we'd be cooking with gas. 

Tethering through wi-fi (sending small jpegs to an ipad or Mac from teh 2nd SD slot while writing the RAWS to the other) is also almost there. Connection time-outs on the Eye-fi card and the weak processeor on the iPad are the only obstacles. 

Having an iPad talk back and forth to the camera, with touch-zoom and maybe touch-focus is tantalizingly close, yet still so very far away.

In fairness, Pentax didn't make this camera for studio shooters. Ironic, because that's where its performed best for me.

First company who gets that it's about ease and useability and not mega-pixels wins. Pentax did well in-paradigm on useability on the 645D - moved the bar way up in my view - but it's still inside the SLR paradigm.   RED is creating its own paradigm but, like you say, it's still a monster.

- N.
Logged
Nick Devlin   @onelittlecamera        ww
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up