I have owned a Hasselblad 501C/M with a Phase P45+, a 203FE with a Hasselblad CFV-39 and an H2 with a Phase P45+. I too do not particularly like the way the Fuji H lenses render, but the H primes I have used are sharp.
I did not own the systems at the same time, so I cannot provide any A/B comparison shots. In the end, though, I used the H2 with the CFV adapter, because I did not find the AF to be particularly quick and was fine with MF.
Not sure what kind of information you're looking for, but obviously the handling between the two systems is vastly different. V being manual focus only, that is the deciding factor for many, as our eyes age. It's also 6x6, not 645, fully manual versus electronic, even the handling of lens hoods (if you use them). Here the H got it right.
For the nature work that I do, I found the CFe and FE lenses (the latter on the 203FE, of course) delivered the best results. I was not happy with the bokeh of the CF* series--the pentagonal aperture gave it somewhat of a harsh quality. If memory serves, the H glass has a hexagonal aperture, which to my eyes was marginally better.