Topic: Ice Age (Read 1664 times)

Timo Löfgren · « **on:** November 28, 2010, 04:14:45 am »

.......

Josh-H · « **Reply #1 on:** November 28, 2010, 04:58:15 am »

Beautiful.

Eric Myrvaagnes · « **Reply #2 on:** November 28, 2010, 08:01:57 am »

Quote from: Josh-H on November 28, 2010, 04:58:15 am

Beautiful.

+1.

popnfresh · « **Reply #3 on:** November 29, 2010, 09:10:57 am »

I like the top half of the image very much. The bottom half isn't working for me.

Bruce Cox · « **Reply #4 on:** November 29, 2010, 11:24:06 am »

I like it, though queued by popnfresh, I see the water ice below center vertically and in the middle laterally as less connected than the other parts. I like the grass. Bruce

David Saffir · « **Reply #5 on:** December 06, 2010, 12:14:57 am »

I tend to agree - a crop right below the line of black rocks could be very interesting.

David Saffir
GuruShots Photo Critique - a contributor on Gurushots, a new resource for creative photographers

John R Smith · « **Reply #6 on:** December 06, 2010, 04:37:12 am »

Timo

Ignore these fools

- don't change a thing! It's a superb landscape, with great framing and beautiful handling of the tonal range. A picture I would be proud to have made.

Actually, it's a bit too good to be on here. You're making my own stuff look crap, dammit. Timo, you're banned . . . .

John

stamper · « **Reply #7 on:** December 06, 2010, 10:11:32 am »

I think the bottom half is needed to lead your eyes into the scene. Composition is spot on. Toning is very good and not over saturated.

Author Topic: Ice Age (Read 1664 times)

Timo Löfgren

Ice Age

Josh-H

Re: Ice Age

Eric Myrvaagnes

Re: Ice Age

popnfresh

Re: Ice Age

Bruce Cox

Re: Ice Age

David Saffir

Re: Ice Age

John R Smith

Re: Ice Age

stamper

Re: Ice Age