Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Flower Seller  (Read 1724 times)

John Camp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2171
Flower Seller
« on: November 18, 2010, 12:03:24 pm »

Degas!

Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Flower Seller
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2010, 03:08:22 pm »

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Flower Seller
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2010, 11:05:45 am »

John, I think I have also observed that the art lovers here seem to have gone on holiday.

;-(

Rob C

Christoph C. Feldhaim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2509
  • There is no rule! No - wait ...
Re: Flower Seller
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2010, 11:23:37 am »

When I saw M's image I thought:
"I'd like to see more skin opposed to these pastel flower tones"

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Flower Seller
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2010, 02:44:01 pm »

Obviously the essential questions are these:

Did Degas use a Canon or a Nikon? Or perhaps MF?

 ::)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

John Camp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2171
Re: Flower Seller
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2010, 02:57:39 pm »

Obviously the essential questions are these:

Did Degas use a Canon or a Nikon? Or perhaps MF?


Ah, I've been waiting for somebody to ask. Of all the people associated with the Impressionists (Degas wasn't really that much of an Impressionist, but he hung out with them), he was probably the one most influenced by the relatively new art of photography, and owned and used a number of cameras. More importantly, a number of scholars think he was influenced by the way that cameras *cropped* -- quite arbitrarily, by the standards of painting, which organized the full frame. A camera was just as happy to cut somebody in half, or to shoot straight down, etc. Degas picked up on this, and a lot of his paintings show very photo-like crops and photo-like angles, unusual and unexpected and quite radical for painting of the times. The painting above is an example of that -- nobody had ever squeezed a body into one corner of the frame like that, looking *away* from the center of attention, with this huge bush of flowers dominating the center. But cameras do it quite naturally and beautifully, as Michael demonstrated.
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Flower Seller
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2010, 03:19:56 pm »

Ah, I've been waiting for somebody to ask. Of all the people associated with the Impressionists (Degas wasn't really that much of an Impressionist, but he hung out with them), he was probably the one most influenced by the relatively new art of photography, and owned and used a number of cameras. More importantly, a number of scholars think he was influenced by the way that cameras *cropped* -- quite arbitrarily, by the standards of painting, which organized the full frame. A camera was just as happy to cut somebody in half, or to shoot straight down, etc. Degas picked up on this, and a lot of his paintings show very photo-like crops and photo-like angles, unusual and unexpected and quite radical for painting of the times. The painting above is an example of that -- nobody had ever squeezed a body into one corner of the frame like that, looking *away* from the center of attention, with this huge bush of flowers dominating the center. But cameras do it quite naturally and beautifully, as Michael demonstrated.


Yes, but this later, very photographic mirror lens shot is even better!

Rob C
Pages: [1]   Go Up