Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 75   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice  (Read 322636 times)

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1817
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1320 on: November 10, 2012, 01:26:31 PM »

Is any company good company?
Logged

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5821
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1321 on: November 11, 2012, 02:33:48 AM »

I should start by mentioning that this scene doesn't exist.  Well, sort of.  I was at Clover Point, shooting the mountains in Washington across the Juan de Fuca Strait, and I made 18 images (6*3 exposures) for an HDR panorama.  Unfortunately, when I combined the images in Autopano Pro, it didn't merge them all into one panorama as I'd hoped - not enough overlap for a couple of images.  So, undaunted, I told the program to merge all of the images into one panorama, in one row.  What it did was to overlay all 18 images on top of each other in one frame.  Not quite what I'd anticipated, but interesting...

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~

My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings

kikashi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5421
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1322 on: November 11, 2012, 03:30:30 AM »

I should start by mentioning that this scene doesn't exist. 

It should.

Jeremy
Logged

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8139
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1323 on: November 11, 2012, 04:24:43 AM »

I should start by mentioning that this scene doesn't exist.  Well, sort of.  I was at Clover Point, shooting the mountains in Washington across the Juan de Fuca Strait, and I made 18 images (6*3 exposures) for an HDR panorama.  Unfortunately, when I combined the images in Autopano Pro, it didn't merge them all into one panorama as I'd hoped - not enough overlap for a couple of images.  So, undaunted, I told the program to merge all of the images into one panorama, in one row.  What it did was to overlay all 18 images on top of each other in one frame.  Not quite what I'd anticipated, but interesting...

Mike.

Very nice… even if it's only a dream!
Logged
Francois

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9405
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1324 on: November 11, 2012, 01:00:47 PM »

Very, very cool, Mike!

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1325 on: November 11, 2012, 10:49:43 PM »

Cemetery in the fog. The fog gave motion technique a real boost, surreal. I missed the sunrise, but the fog helped out quite a bit.

JMR

Logged

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5821
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1326 on: November 12, 2012, 02:26:24 AM »

Thanks, folks!

Intriguing, John!

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~

My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings

Tony Jay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2604
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1327 on: November 12, 2012, 02:55:37 AM »

Cemetery in the fog. The fog gave motion technique a real boost, surreal. I missed the sunrise, but the fog helped out quite a bit.

JMR



Lovely effect.
Very enjoyable image.

Tony Jay
Logged

jeremypayne

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1328 on: November 12, 2012, 10:02:10 PM »

I have been scanning prints ... for many shots that's all I have ...

This was from the summer of 1985 somewhere in the South West - perhaps the Grand Canyon.

I always liked this print and am glad I was able to preserve it in some form.




Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9405
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1329 on: November 12, 2012, 10:23:40 PM »

Monumental, Jeremy!!! Pete Turner or Jay Maisel come to mind (that's a compliment).

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1817
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1330 on: November 12, 2012, 10:54:36 PM »

I love it! I guess you don't recall how you made it ?!
Logged

jeremypayne

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1331 on: November 12, 2012, 11:35:20 PM »

Thanks, guys ... A true Kodachrome moment.

It was shot on Kodachrome 64 and printed at a boston lab.  Pretty sure it was a Yashica rangefinder camera.

I think it was the next year when I got the Olympus OM2s which I used into the 1990s.
Logged

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5821
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1332 on: November 13, 2012, 02:03:18 AM »

Jay Maisel for sure...  :)

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~

My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings

kencameron

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 840
    • Recent Photographs
Re: Without Prejudice: Self Portrait in the Woods (with Camera)
« Reply #1333 on: November 14, 2012, 04:59:04 AM »

Post processed of course, but it started in camera with an unintended use of spot rather than averaging metering.
Logged
Ken Cameron

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1817
Re: Without Prejudice: Self Portrait in the Woods (with Camera)
« Reply #1334 on: November 14, 2012, 09:20:36 AM »

Post processed of course, but it started in camera with an unintended use of spot rather than averaging metering.
I like the idea, maybe try not to completely blow away the area around the shadow. Or you could try the other way also, make the shadow well exposed and the rest significantly darker, it might fit the idea even better.
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1817
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1335 on: November 14, 2012, 03:52:03 PM »

bigger toys, same fun?
Logged

WalterEG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1155
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1336 on: November 18, 2012, 04:25:41 PM »

I am about to switch back to 8x10 and contact printing, so I dug out a handy print (actually an 8x10 enlargement off a 4x5 neg) and scanned it to test the waters.

Cheers,

W
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 944
    • pbase galleries
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1337 on: November 21, 2012, 05:33:35 PM »

These are more mundane than tiger tails, however they are also from film and hanging.

Bruce
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1817
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1338 on: November 21, 2012, 10:09:38 PM »

Almost waiting for the winter. Although we still have nice days photographically speaking is not a very productive period, most things are grayish.
Logged

jeremypayne

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1339 on: November 25, 2012, 09:48:07 AM »

More from the film archives .... I went looking for the original slide from that Grand Canyon sunset.

I didn't find it, but I found one from just a few moments before:

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 75   Go Up