Pages: 1 ... 66 67 [68] 69 70 ... 75   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice  (Read 477675 times)

jeremypayne

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1340 on: November 25, 2012, 09:50:38 am »

A couple street shots from the film archives:



Logged

jeremypayne

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1341 on: November 25, 2012, 09:52:37 am »

A few from Israel in the 1980s ...





Logged

kencameron

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 840
    • Recent Photographs
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1342 on: November 26, 2012, 05:42:23 am »

A Found Poem
Logged
Ken Cameron

kencameron

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 840
    • Recent Photographs
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1343 on: November 27, 2012, 11:11:49 pm »

In Praise of Paintwork
Logged
Ken Cameron

PDobson

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 80
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1344 on: December 10, 2012, 11:05:22 am »

A couple from the ice festival in Hyalite Canyon (Bozeman, MT) last weekend.

The first is a photo of Mike looking smooth while starting the lead on Curtains,  (30m WI4).

The next day we slogged up to Twin Falls, (60m WI3). Unfortunately, Mike decided to fall on the final bulge and he somehow put a crampon into his hand. I feel this photo nicely captures the feeling of the moment, as Dan (who happens to be a wilderness first responder) assesses the situation. It's important to note that while it looks pretty nasty, the puncture didn't hit anything important and Mike was climbing the next day. We're all laughing about it now.

Phillip
Logged

Patricia Sheley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1112
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1345 on: December 10, 2012, 10:39:40 pm »

...a different wound.
Logged
A common woman~

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18087
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1346 on: December 11, 2012, 10:00:22 pm »

My 13-year old daughter, striking an impromptu pose ( after watching too many "America's Next Top Model" episodes, I guess) in front of street Christmas lights:

Riaan van Wyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 812
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1347 on: December 12, 2012, 02:40:41 am »

My 13-year old daughter, striking an impromptu pose ( after watching too many "America's Next Top Model" episodes, I guess) in front of street Christmas lights:

Being school holidays mine (9) is driving me dilly with wanting to do "model shoots" not that I know anything about them but nevermind. I obliged this past Saturday but I hear there is one booked for this weekend again.   

32BT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3095
    • Pictures
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1348 on: December 12, 2012, 12:49:24 pm »


EDIT: content removed by request.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2012, 04:03:03 am by opgr »
Logged
Regards,
~ O ~
If you can stomach it: pictures

32BT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3095
    • Pictures
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1349 on: December 12, 2012, 02:39:09 pm »

Your nasty tone duly noted.

I have no problem with any of your opinions about me, my postings, photography etc., but making a sarcastic comment about a kid is just plain ugly.

Back to photography... I thought it was a notch above "family snaps." I've seen worse, on occasion, in the Professional Works thread. But than again, I am obviously biased.

As for the theme of this thread, this is how it was defined by its author, Rob C: "...a spot where we can hang pix that aren't looking for 'critique', that exist just for the hell of it..." which does not seem to exclude "family snaps."



Well, let me put it differently: If you want to be protective towards your children, then be very, very careful about posting clear images of them on internet. I think one of your previous shots of her behind the beatscurtain, is a) of better artistic quality, and b) better suited to the medium. But obviously, your entitled to a different opinion. As regards to "sarcasm" and "kids": If kids these days are capable of doing this, then I am pretty much done with either the idea of innocence in children or the parents who raise this type of breed...
Logged
Regards,
~ O ~
If you can stomach it: pictures

nemo295

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1350 on: December 12, 2012, 03:57:19 pm »


of better artistic quality
In your opinion.

Quote
better suited to the medium.
Whatever the heck that means.

Quote
But obviously, your entitled to a different opinion.
Yes, in fact he was entitled to it before you decided he was.

Quote
If kids these days are capable of doing this, then I am pretty much done with either the idea of innocence in children or the parents who raise this type of breed...
I'm done with people who would condemn all children for the actions of a few disturbed individuals.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1351 on: December 12, 2012, 11:13:57 pm »

Oscar,

When Rob C started this thread he made it very clear that it should be a critique-free zone. In that spirit I would ask that you withdraw your critique of Slobodan's photo. It doesn't matter whether it was a good critique or a bad one. It doesn't belong in this thread.

Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

32BT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3095
    • Pictures
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1352 on: December 13, 2012, 04:08:00 am »

Oscar,

When Rob C started this thread he made it very clear that it should be a critique-free zone. In that spirit I would ask that you withdraw your critique of Slobodan's photo. It doesn't matter whether it was a good critique or a bad one. It doesn't belong in this thread.

Consider it withdrawn...
Logged
Regards,
~ O ~
If you can stomach it: pictures

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1353 on: December 13, 2012, 09:09:25 am »

Consider it withdrawn...
Thank you.

And a belated thank you for the wonderful plugin Convert-to-BW-Pro that I used to great effect until Lightroom came along.

Eric
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

32BT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3095
    • Pictures
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1354 on: December 13, 2012, 10:05:11 am »

Thank you.

And a belated thank you for the wonderful plugin Convert-to-BW-Pro that I used to great effect until Lightroom came along.

Eric

I'm running a version on iPad at the moment, with realtime video conversion...
Logged
Regards,
~ O ~
If you can stomach it: pictures

RobbieV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 281
    • My work.
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1355 on: December 13, 2012, 02:12:52 pm »

I know we're not supposed to critique, but I like how the bokeh shares the same shapes of the curls of her hair. The colours of each don't fight each other, but work together quite nicely.

I like it, Slobodan
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18087
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1356 on: December 13, 2012, 03:01:25 pm »

I know we're not supposed to critique...

Thanks Robbie. I think the idea of the thread is not to be totally devoid of any comments, and Rob himself provided plenty of. By "critique-free," I believe Rob meant the absence of what's-wrong and how-to-improve comments, given that we already have a dedicated forum section for it.

EDIT: Found a quote from Rob (highlights mine):

Quote
... You'll also note that it's very hard to find any second-guessing from me on any of them, if at all. I do sometimes offer praise, seldom (if ever) condemn; but telling another what he should do or have done is something quite else and I don't like it. That's why I started Without Prejudice in order to provide a space where folks could post a pic without the annoyance of hearing how another would have handled it...
« Last Edit: December 13, 2012, 03:11:47 pm by Slobodan Blagojevic »
Logged

RobbieV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 281
    • My work.
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1357 on: December 13, 2012, 09:45:45 pm »

Here here!

Thanks for your patience.
Logged

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5248
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1358 on: December 16, 2012, 12:02:46 pm »

Every once in a while I come across places I have been to many times and then see them differently in different light, or in this case, with artificial light. We were on a Xmas lights outing when I spotted these shapes as I looked up. Of course it was the juxtaposition of the striking artificial light-colours that made the shapes stand out. I didn't mind freezing for a few good shots.

JMR

Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice
« Reply #1359 on: December 16, 2012, 01:02:11 pm »

Nice graphic, John.

Rob C
Pages: 1 ... 66 67 [68] 69 70 ... 75   Go Up