Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Good read about Annie and the fickle fine art foto market  (Read 916 times)

Justan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1928
    • Justan-Elk.com
Good read about Annie and the fickle fine art foto market
« on: October 29, 2010, 07:20:19 pm »

How Annie got shot
By John Gapper

Published: October 22 2010 23:06 | Last updated: October 22 2010 23:06

At work, Richard Petty runs a clinic around the corner from London’s Harley Street where he specialises in treating men with sexual and prostate conditions. For relaxation, he collects photographs of women.

Petty is not interested in any photos, only ones of recognisable figures with interesting careers or life stories. Among others, he owns portraits of the actresses Juliet Stevenson and Scarlett Johansson and the artist Tracey Emin. Another, taken in 1909 by Alexander Bassano, a famous society photographer, is of Maud Allan, an exotic dancer and purported mistress of Edward VII whose Salomé dance was declared obscene by the Lord Chamberlain. He started collecting 12 years ago, going to specialist galleries in London and finding photographs that captured his imagination.

“It is not just a matter of fame. I like to know who the woman is and the story behind the image. The best possible image is a vintage print but if that is impossible to find then I get as near as I can. Each one has to be perfection,” he says.

In principle, therefore, he should be a potential customer for Annie Leibovitz, the notoriously perfectionist Vanity Fair photographer whose photos of Hollywood actors and actresses and other figures are among the best-known celebrity images. Her photos of a naked, pregnant Demi Moore and of an equally naked John Lennon hugging Yoko Ono, hours before his killing in 1980, defined their age...

The rest: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/76af3c7a-dbf2-11df-af09-00144feabdc0.html


Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Good read about Annie and the fickle fine art foto market
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2010, 05:40:19 am »

An interesting article. If I were to hazard a guess, I'd say that part of the problem is the subject matter.

Yes, personalities sell, but whilst they help sell the snapper who catches them to other photography users, I suspect that today's set of celebs is a far cry from those of the Golden Era (here we go again!) of Hollywood. Today's bunch holds a faux glamour for the wannabe that buys the celeb trash mags, but the guy with the money is another market altogether. If you were a really wealthy guy and able to dump a cool half-million whatsits on a photograph, would you do it for Demi Moore? Clara Bow or Marlene or Marilyn might present you with a different set of more interesting alternatives, but still, half a million?

I also wonder how the real sales figures for Helmut Newton stack up.

Rob C
Pages: [1]   Go Up