I doubt there is much point in Michael personally testing the D2x. It is very difficult objectively to assess things like handling if you are immersed in another system as totally as Michael is with Canon. Thom Hogan would be a good choice as a guest tester, with maybe Michael chpping in a few obeservations.
That is, if Nikon ever get a D2x in a reviewers hands.
Quentin
Hi Quentin,
I for one disagree with you.
Michael used the Nikon system for years, I am sure that he has enough knowledge of it to be able to use it. Besides, he has been testing other systems, namely Minolta, Kodak etc... that he probably has far less knowledge about that Nikon.
Besides, you and I know that getting used to a nikon D2X will take at most 30 minutes for anyone reasonnably used to shooting with pro-level DSLR. Michael is an expert, he would have zero problem adapting. Getting the very best image out the D2X might be another problem (that Thom would indeed handle better), but the very orientation that Michael is giving to his reviews, focussing more on the handling than on image quality, should allow him to give a fair go to the D2x even without entering pixel peeping territory.
Finally, most of his testing equipement, but Canon probably, is being lent to him by a large photo equipment shop in toronto. I am sure that they will sell the D2x, and should therefore be in a position to lend one to Michael if he decided to give the D2X a try (I am sure that could lend him a 200-400 VR with it too...).
A lot of us would like to hear fair criticism of the D2x by Michael and, let's face it, there is nothing in the way of him reviewing this camera but his lack of willingness to do so.
Why he doesn't want to put his hands on a Nikon anymore remains a complete mistery to me, since it is a loss-loss situation, both for LL as an objetive information source on landscape photography and for the end users in that we are deprived from Michael's high quality review for one piece of equipment that is completely relevant in the landscape and wildlife shooting context.
Best regards,
Bernard