When you talk about Laser here, it should mean "digital presses" (compared to offset presses).
Systems like HP Indigo or Xerox Nuvera. Very sophisticated laser-printers for low-volume, high-quality printing.
Not desktop/office laserprinters. And I've seldom seen any of these desktop-printers produce descent B&W.
On the other hand, it's rare even for the bigger digital press-systems.
Maybe someone on this forum had deeper knowledge about why inkjet and offset can produce far better B&W than digital presses.
/Sven
That's easy. Inkjets nowadays generally use at least 2 strengths of grey plus black ink for black & white prints, which permits lots of depth and nuance. High quality offset printing does something analogous with duotones/tritones, using multiple plates and passes to provide a rich and subtle black & white reproduction. (Just look at black & white reproductions in any photo book circa 1950 to see how dreadful offset printing with a single black plate can be).
Laser printers by comparison are handicapped. Most of them have 3 color cartridges and a single black cartridge. Black & white prints will be made using only the black cartridge, which yields the same problems with poor d-max, coarse dot structure and overall crudity that you get with an inkjet using only a single black ink. I imagine it's possible to get some color toner onto the page, but then you'll get metameric failure and color crossovers analogous to those bedeviling black & white inkjet prints made with mixtures of color inks.
I've had calendars printed on a high-end laser printer. The only images that work are relatively 'busy' photographs that hide the printer's limitations (relatively coarse dithering algorithms, serious problems with banding in smooth gradients).