His gamut readings for both his sRGB and aRGB attempt are way too far off.
EDIT: Although I did forget that he was measuring the preset for sRGB which might be a bit off until the monitor settles in, all the same it still looks likely a bit too far off.
He might have a bad copy of the spyder3 (and some say at least 1 in 3 are bad, and only 1 in 3, at best, are good) and/or it doesn't agree well with the particular spectrum put out by this monitor.
BTW what was the goal for the calibrations/profiles?
I used a combo of SVII + multiprofiler to tweak the sRGB mode and thus I get something that works fine with non-managed programs and the true sRGB TRC. I use that for web browsing. Then I did a similar thing but switched to Gamma 2.2 and use that for TC/movies/games.
For photo-editing I just used SVII and set native gamut, D65 and then let it profile it.
Well here is the situation: I bought the NEC PA241 for raw processing and photoediting. I am not a professional, but neither a novice in Digital photography.
My aim was to buy a good monitor, wide gamut (why not?) I had a great price on the PA241, so here we are.
When I installed it I noticed that it has some presets as AdobeRGB, sRGB you can choose, VERY different in colors. My goal is to have the best mix between color/raw processing in Lightroom and the fact that I will for sure post photo in sRGB and, maybe sometimes print.
I must say I won't print so many photos.
So, as the AdobeRGB mode and sRGB mode (factory hw modes) were so different in colors, I wanted to calibrate it, Spyder+Spectraview.
Summarizing: I am not a professional, I only want to have a good calibrated monitor for my poor sRGB outputs.
Now I'm tryng to stay with sRGB at 160.
BTW, how do you set native gamut in SVII?
Thanks again,