Hi Guys,
I understand that everyone is happy with the solutions they have. We sell the equipment for big money, but unfortunately the weakest link is always the computer and software and, of course, the connection between the computer and camera. Often spend 40k Euros for the camera and lenses, have delivered or not 60k Euros on a system that would work flawlessly? This specialized box, hardware-assisted each function in the program. (Real time) I know it's a huge cash, but would not have delivered more money for such a system? And so we have to buy a computer that they rebuild (read spend more time behind where we bought it, Apple sells the hardware from getting worse components, slow hdd, poor quality firewire cards, etc.) Our producers competent authority permits, of course, always blame the computer ... that you need to change something, add it. Photographer does not always have such knowledge of information technology like me. Is it so hard to our lords in PhaseOne / Hasselblad / Leaf understand? We spend this money, and get the equipment which should be a tool which we should not think, just to use it.I will not mention the poor quality of the connection, or the display of the Stone Age. I do not know people who would not have problems with MFDB.If it is not possible to build specialized equipment instead of the computer, give us the ability to connect to the PC cards such as Tesla, "Quadro Plex D ', then our computers (often laptops) will be able to cope with enormous volumes of data and we can finally begin to work. Is it such a terrible problem to give the work a few young talented developers? Apparently, in the above mentioned companies are not working, people who are aware of this. Well, maybe a president of one of the producers read this and reflect on this. Waiting on the bid
Best regards,
Design Freak
