Seeing as you are another John R a feeling of kinship prompts me to reply
This sort of photography is actually not my personal area at all, as you would probably guess, but it does intrigue me. I think that the pictures do work very well, and the thing that you have going for you is a consistent and recognisable style which is always a good thing. The problem that I see with this approach is twofold - one is that conventional photographers may simply dismiss it because it turns the norms of good practice on their head (focus, sharpness, depth of field), but that is really a problem for them, not you. The second issue is more problematic, in that an impressionistic style of this kind may itself become a creative trap, where for the sake of style and consistency one is forced to work within an ever-narrowing form where you can never actually indulge yourself with a sharp picture. Still, the fun bit about art is that you can always change your mind.
My favourites here are the first frame, for its strange combination of sharp and unsharp - very appealing - and the last, for its total abstraction. The others, I feel, are using this impressionist technique but without such a clear sense of purpose as my favourites. And I am surprised that no-one else here felt moved to comment.
John