Subject: Film to Digital to Film for Panoramics
About 5 years ago I rekindled my love for photography and invested in a new medium format camera system. I mainly shot transparencies (645, 67) and scanned them to a film scanner, I wanted the highest quality I could afford, my intention was to build up a portfolio which I can enlarge to vast sizes. I spent a long time looking at the digital options, but decided that an old film system would be the best option for my limited budget.
I spent my college years as a art and photography student, which involved quite a large range of topics, so I was keen to learn more about my current interests with the intention of finding my niche with this newly acquired camera system. Over the recent years I shot people, macro, street, landscapes and panoramic landscapes with the use of image stitching. The more images I shot the more I realised it was the latter that gave me the most pleasure and satisfaction, so I started doing less of the rest in a bid to hone in on my skills.
The post process was quite long winded, I had a glass holder for my scanner to keep the film flat, but it would only accept 1 frame at a time, so a 4 frame stitch would be quite a repetitive process, not to mention the scan times (nikon 8000) - I only seemed to get desirable scans on a setting which meant each scan took about 15 minutes -that was after about 6 months of scanning trial and error! With a full time job meaning I am away from 0700, returning at 2000, the time problems where causing real productivity issues, not to mention the issues with stitching the frames later, having to position each frame in the glass holder to a precise location to avoid any issues was a very delicate practice.
As time moved on, so did technology, the price of a used DSLR had dropped massively and suddenly within my price range. I weighed up all the pros and cons of my current setup, and came to the conclusion that I would be far better off switching to a digital system.
Sold the film gear, including scanner and along came the 16MP DSLR, with a full frame sensor and instant access to the files - no more scanning! Each image lined up so made stitching a much more pleasant experience.
I also got into bracketing the images to retain good noise levels in the shadows, and no clipping in the highlights - something I never did with the MF gear. I actually think the quality I get now from the vertically stitched digital images surpasses the MF images I shot previously.
GREAT! .... BUT ....
I seem to have developed a big issue: COMPOSITION.
Now of course this would have been the case whether shooting digital or film when image stitching is needed, but as I continue to develop it is something that I truly miss with single shot images. I always knew there were specialist panoramic film cameras available before I invested in the digital system, but I guess I felt the more simplified digital capture process outweighed the advantages of a single shot panoramic film camera.
Well, I'm starting to question that judgement now. I'm not displeased with my current portfolio, but I do feel that if I could have composed the image before capture I would have ended up with a better image, I'm currently cropping quite heavily as I tend to shoot wider than I need to, knowing that I don't want to miss anything, or crop off anything, but that leaves me with a portfolio with a very inconsistent image ratio, which to me doesn't look very polished. I would prefer it if I did no cropping, and what I shot and saw on the day is what I end up with as an image, and my portfolio was all consistent image sizes. I also of course have problems with movement, any water scenes are hard to pull off, unless I use a super long exposure and blur the water out completely - but I don't always like that.
So that's my current thought process. My minds not made up yet, I'm starting to look at the 617 and 624 solutions, although I would be happy to get rid of the stitching process, I'm also not really looking forward to developing and scanning all over again... not to mention all the nice stuff you get with digital.
I guess you can't have it all in this game, at least not until they bring out a 617 digital back, but maybe I'll be waiting a while (oh and a scanning back is not an option for reasons I wont get into)
Elliot.