Upgraded my PC several months ago to an Intel i7-920, with heaps of disc, 6Gb memory, Gigabyte 9600GT graphics card. Serious hobbies include music and photography so have prof. sound card (24bitx96kHzx8channels), Cubase and PS CS4 installed. ie quality is as important as cost and I'd generally go for better quality over cheaper. I'd be best described as a serious amateur with some history of film photography way back (Olympus OM1, OM4Ti) and recently returned to the Digital world (Nikon D200). That's the background.
I've been making do with 2 old LCD screens (Mitsubishi DV171 and LG L1750SQ) with minimal colour management using a Colormunki. I've always had some issues with print matching but I'm actually happy with the printer (Canon 9000Pro, the original version) which has always provided excellent prints taken with my older point and shoot and through other programmes. It's now time to upgrade to a decent monitor and I've essentially decided on either Eizo or NEC. Now I've had an Eizo before (way back when a 10 inch CRT was considered large) and it was great, fantastic colour, lasted ages etc. I'm definitely put off by the cost but understand the quality issue. Unfortunately down here in Oz finding actual versions of the screens you would like to see before you buy is difficult and often screens are imported only on order.
The screens I'm looking at are the Eizo CG24xW series (where x is 1, 3 or 5) and the NEC PA series (241W and 271W). I'm starting to hone these down to the PA271W vs the CG243W, both are around the same price. Any suggestions, comments, other ideas, experience with the monitors particularly using the Colormunki colorimeter would be more than welcomed.
Thanks in advance, and as a new L/L user I'm seriously impressed with the content of the site and the knowledge of the participants.