Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: MARVIL? EVIL?  (Read 5118 times)

Yakim Peled

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 174
MARVIL? EVIL?
« on: May 25, 2010, 08:34:46 AM »

"I'm suggesting here today the name MARVIL, which stands for Mirrorless Reflex Viewfinder Interchangeable Lens."

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/...sony-nex5.shtml

I must admit I don't get it. Doesn't Reflex indicates the mirror? If so, how can a "Mirrorless Reflex" exist?

"Sony Does EVIL"

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/...nex-intro.shtml

But it does not. It has no Electronic Viewfinder.  So the EV part of the EVIL is just not there. Michael has a whole paragraph on this:

"There is no electronic eye level viewfinder at this time. It isn't clear whether or not there is one coming, though since there is a smart connector on the top of the camera that currently allows the attachment of a flash and an microphone, it is not unfeasible that an EVF lies in the future. I certainly hope so, since I believe that a lot of more serious photographers looking to add a NEX to their kit will find its lack a serious failing, and will possibly choose one of the Four Thirds competitors that at least provides this option. "

And even if they will introduce one, it will be an accessory. The camera itself will still lack the EV part.

So, may I suggest MILC as in Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Compact?

Thank you for your thoughts.

Logged
Happy shooting,
Yakim.

Ken Doo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 907
    • http://www.kendoophotography.com
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2010, 09:08:33 AM »

Quote from: Yakim Peled
....
So, may I suggest MILC as in Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Compact?

Thank you for your thoughts.

I was thinking more along the lines of MILF:  "Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Fun" but apparently that acronym is already taken.

 

jduncan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 394
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2010, 03:05:53 PM »

Quote from: kdphotography
I was thinking more along the lines of MILF:  "Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Fun" but apparently that acronym is already taken.

 
MILK:  "Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Kit"
Logged
english is not my first language, an I know is shows

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8902
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2010, 03:21:43 PM »

Quote from: Yakim Peled
... So, may I suggest MILC as in Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Compact?
Hmmm... why would something that does not exist (i.e., mirror) be part of the name? You could as well name it KIL as in Kitchensinkless Interchangeable Lens then

fredjeang

  • Guest
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2010, 03:47:51 PM »

May I suggest UGLY ?
Useless Gadget Launched Yesterday

Logged

Wayne Fox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3455
    • waynefox.com
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2010, 04:41:34 PM »

Quote from: Yakim Peled
"I'm suggesting here today the name MARVIL, which stands for Mirrorless Reflex Viewfinder Interchangeable Lens."

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/...sony-nex5.shtml

I must admit I don't get it. Doesn't Reflex indicates the mirror? If so, how can a "Mirrorless Reflex" exist?

"Sony Does EVIL"

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/...nex-intro.shtml

But it does not. It has no Electronic Viewfinder.  So the EV part of the EVIL is just not there. Michael has a whole paragraph on this:

"There is no electronic eye level viewfinder at this time. It isn't clear whether or not there is one coming, though since there is a smart connector on the top of the camera that currently allows the attachment of a flash and an microphone, it is not unfeasible that an EVF lies in the future. I certainly hope so, since I believe that a lot of more serious photographers looking to add a NEX to their kit will find its lack a serious failing, and will possibly choose one of the Four Thirds competitors that at least provides this option. "

And even if they will introduce one, it will be an accessory. The camera itself will still lack the EV part.

So, may I suggest MILC as in Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Compact?

Thank you for your thoughts.
I had some similar thoughts at first regarding the fact that these cameras don't seem to use a reflex system, but then I decided maybe it's right after all.  I don't think reflex system has anything to do with mirrors or prisms, but in fact instead means a system to preview the image through the actual lens of the camera which these do.  (as opposed to a rangefinder camera where a secondary lens system is used.

I disagree with your second point, these cameras by their very nature use an electronic viewfinder. Whether that viewfinder is one you hold up to your eye or not isn't relevant, since nothing about the term electronic viewfinder suggests anything other than a way to view the image via an electronic device rather than optically.  The viewfinder system is completely electronic, whether it be an LCD on the back of the camera or a small LCD designed to be held up to your eye.  (In fact, I personally have been using the Hoodman for quite some time so I'm using the LCD on the back held up to my eye.)

Personally I don't like the EVIL acronym either though it seems to be gaining momentum ( - just sounds kind of evil   ). I appreciate the effort to try for an alternative.  Probably too late to change things at this point.

bradleygibson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 829
    • http://GibsonPhotographic.com
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2010, 07:34:33 PM »

I've always understood 'reflex' to indicate that the mirror returns automatically to its lowered position immediately after exposure, and not during the film-wind sequence.

And I have always considered any view of the scene to be captured to be a 'finder' be it a prism, mirror, glass screen (as in waist-level)--even ground-glass or a live view LCD.

EVIL gets the point across for me; Personally, I don't see the need for a new acronym for this type of camera.

Good luck with that.  

PeterAit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2515
    • Peter Aitken Photographs
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2010, 08:19:00 PM »

Quote from: Wayne Fox
I had some similar thoughts at first regarding the fact that these cameras don't seem to use a reflex system, but then I decided maybe it's right after all.  I don't think reflex system has anything to do with mirrors or prisms, but in fact instead means a system to preview the image through the actual lens of the camera which these do.  (as opposed to a rangefinder camera where a secondary lens system is used.

I think the OP is right, reflex = mirror or prism. For example, twin lens reflex cameras did not let you view thru the taking lens but were still called reflexes. Also, by your definition any $100 point-and-shoot is a reflex because you view thru the lens on the LCD screen.

As for a name, why not just interchangeable lens compact?
Logged
Peter
"Photographic technique is a means to an end, never the end itself."
View my web page
View my Facebook page

Yakim Peled

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 174
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2010, 01:32:58 AM »

Quote from: kdphotography
I was thinking more along the lines of MILF:  "Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Fun" but apparently that acronym is already taken.

 

I tried to resist the temptation of saying that myself.  
Logged
Happy shooting,
Yakim.

Yakim Peled

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 174
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2010, 01:49:21 AM »

Quote from: Slobodan Blagojevic
Hmmm... why would something that does not exist (i.e., mirror) be part of the name? You could as well name it KIL as in Kitchensinkless Interchangeable Lens then

Hummm..... Maybe because they are the first cameras with interchangeable lenses and no mirror? And KIL is no better than EVIL. It's just bad.  
« Last Edit: May 26, 2010, 01:56:03 AM by Yakim Peled »
Logged
Happy shooting,
Yakim.

Yakim Peled

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 174
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2010, 02:34:55 AM »

Quote from: Wayne Fox
I had some similar thoughts at first regarding the fact that these cameras don't seem to use a reflex system, but then I decided maybe it's right after all.  I don't think reflex system has anything to do with mirrors or prisms, but in fact instead means a system to preview the image through the actual lens of the camera which these do.  (as opposed to a rangefinder camera where a secondary lens system is used.

I think it does.

"A single-lens reflex (SLR) camera is a camera that typically uses a semi-automatic moving mirror system that permits the photographer to sometimes see exactly what will be captured by the film or digital imaging system, as opposed to pre-SLR cameras where the view through the viewfinder could be significantly different from what was captured on film."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-lens_reflex_camera

Quote from: Wayne Fox
I disagree with your second point, these cameras by their very nature use an electronic viewfinder. Whether that viewfinder is one you hold up to your eye or not isn't relevant, since nothing about the term electronic viewfinder suggests anything other than a way to view the image via an electronic device rather than optically.  The viewfinder system is completely electronic, whether it be an LCD on the back of the camera or a small LCD designed to be held up to your eye.  (In fact, I personally have been using the Hoodman for quite some time so I'm using the LCD on the back held up to my eye.)

That's an interesting PoV but I guess we'll have to agree that we disagree. Despite the fact that you can see the image in the LCD, I can't see the relationship to a viewfinder. If I may add, Michael also does not see the LCD as a viewfinder. See the quote in my OP.

Quote from: Wayne Fox
Personally I don't like the EVIL acronym either though it seems to be gaining momentum ( - just sounds kind of evil   ). I appreciate the effort to try for an alternative.  Probably too late to change things at this point.

Well, I am not the only one who is not happy with this acronym. Andy Westlake also sees the EV problem. He proposed ILC.

http://blog.dpreview.com/editorial/2010/01...ll-cameras.html

I just added another letter, to make it more pronounceable.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2010, 02:41:39 AM by Yakim Peled »
Logged
Happy shooting,
Yakim.

Yakim Peled

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 174
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #11 on: May 26, 2010, 02:46:37 AM »

Quote from: PeterAit
I think the OP is right, reflex = mirror or prism. For example, twin lens reflex cameras did not let you view thru the taking lens but were still called reflexes. Also, by your definition any $100 point-and-shoot is a reflex because you view thru the lens on the LCD screen.

As for a name, why not just interchangeable lens compact?

Just to make it more pronounceable. Don't you think that it's easier to say MILC (pronounced "milk") than ILC (pronounced "eelk" or as separated letters "I - L - C")?
Logged
Happy shooting,
Yakim.

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8902
  • When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.
    • My website
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #12 on: May 26, 2010, 10:11:55 AM »

Quote from: Yakim Peled
.... Maybe because they are the first cameras with interchangeable lenses and no mirror?...
Hardly so. Most cameras before TLRs (Twin-Lens Reflex), i.e., view cameras and rangefinders, are "interchangeable lenses and no mirror".

fredjeang

  • Guest
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2010, 11:35:56 AM »

Quote from: Yakim Peled
I tried to resist the temptation of saying that myself.  
Mixing your proposal and mine we would have: ugly milf...
Logged

aaykay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 359
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2010, 12:16:46 PM »


These NEX3/NEX5 models are definitely the start and I predict will shake up the marketplace a lot more than the micro-4/3 (which are "condemned" to perpetuity with their smaller sensor size and larger-than-needed flange-back distance which will make the bodies inordinately thick) models have.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2010, 12:24:38 PM by aaykay »
Logged

aaykay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 359
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #15 on: May 26, 2010, 12:21:43 PM »

Quote from: fredjeang
Mixing your proposal and mine we would have: ugly milf...

An ugly milf ?      You got some weird tastes, fellow !  
Logged

Yakim Peled

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 174
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #16 on: May 26, 2010, 11:59:11 PM »

Quote from: Slobodan Blagojevic
Hardly so. Most cameras before TLRs (Twin-Lens Reflex), i.e., view cameras and rangefinders, are "interchangeable lenses and no mirror".

Before TLRs? Well, I admit I didn't think that far. I guess I should have said: "The first cameras with interchangeable lenses and no mirror in recent times".  
Logged
Happy shooting,
Yakim.

Yakim Peled

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 174
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #17 on: May 27, 2010, 12:04:01 AM »

Quote from: fredjeang
Mixing your proposal and mine we would have: ugly milf...

Yes, but mixing would be difficult, like water and oil. You see, a milf just can't be ugly.  
Logged
Happy shooting,
Yakim.

aaykay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 359
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #18 on: May 27, 2010, 03:43:38 PM »

Quote from: Yakim Peled
You see, a milf just can't be ugly.  

Well, unless he has got some weird tastes, that is.....  
Logged

Yakim Peled

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 174
MARVIL? EVIL?
« Reply #19 on: May 30, 2010, 01:29:41 AM »

Quote from: aaykay
Well, unless he has got some weird tastes, that is.....  

You're right. I was thinking in the more conventional way.    Not the best thing for a photographer.  
Logged
Happy shooting,
Yakim.
Pages: [1]   Go Up