What are the usual shortcomings of HDR in your eyes? There's lots of careless misuse (IMHO) of tone mapping software without understanding the principle purpose of expanding dynamic range. To that end, I've had some degree of success with pushing the boundaries of the medium and producing some satisfying results.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Generally HDR eliminates modeling or contrast, but you have got round this and produced a good result - without PhotMerge...
Mixed lighting photography is difficult enough inside, where you have some control over some of the light sources... but this is complicated.
Photographing at dusk gives you fill, but makes the vehicle lights less significant, you cannot turn the street lights off.
You could spend 6 hours at the location and take pictures in different light and mix, mask and match post... this is the joy of digital - imagine doing it all on one sheet of 5 * 4 film?
¿I suppose you could mask out the road in most of the shots, so the car lights are brighter relative to their background?
This is the short of shot I might dream up to make full use of all the
tools I want (or have) -
shutter-beams to trigger the flash and shutter when a vehicle is in the right place,
4 big battery flashes,
a Medium Format Digital View camera to get the rail in focus,
electronic shutter to enable auto-firing of a view camera shutter ( maybe not required if the flash, not the shutter would be auto-triggered)
pocked wizards for shutter and flash
4-way adjustable pro lens shade to keep out unwanted light.
...one is supposed to think about the subject, and the artistic impression you try to create, but would you ask a painter to make do with a white-washed wall, a stick and a muddy puddle? ...yes, it can be an interesting exercise to see what you can do with the minimum of equipment.