Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Filters: Rodenstock vs. B+W  (Read 3388 times)

Lisa Nikodym

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1705
    • http://www.stanford.edu/~melkor/lisa_pictures/lisa_pictures.html
Filters: Rodenstock vs. B+W
« on: January 20, 2010, 08:48:45 pm »

I needed a polarizer for a new camera, and the camera store salesman said that they don't carry B+W anymore (which I'm not sure I believe), and sold me a Rodenstock multi-coated polarizer instead. I've used multi-coated B+W's in the past. Does anyone here know whether the Rodenstock is about as good as B+W, as long as both are multi-coated? Or should I return it and order a B+W from elsewhere?

Thanks for any advice,
Lisa
Logged
[url=http://www.stanford.edu/~melkor/lis

DarkPenguin

  • Guest
Filters: Rodenstock vs. B+W
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2010, 10:36:16 pm »

Quote from: Lisa Nikodym
I needed a polarizer for a new camera, and the camera store salesman said that they don't carry B+W anymore (which I'm not sure I believe), and sold me a Rodenstock multi-coated polarizer instead. I've used multi-coated B+W's in the past. Does anyone here know whether the Rodenstock is about as good as B+W, as long as both are multi-coated? Or should I return it and order a B+W from elsewhere?

Thanks for any advice,
Lisa

This is why god created B+H Photo and overnight shipping.

Edit: There is a claim that they are rebranded heliopan filters.  If so they should be the equivalent of the B+W's.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2010, 12:13:22 pm by DarkPenguin »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up