Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Kodak Printers  (Read 2051 times)

SamInTexas

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
    • http://www.k5kj.net/
Kodak Printers
« on: November 27, 2009, 06:09:23 am »

Kodak is advertising their printers as being cost effective for ink replacement.

How do the Kodak printers and ink compare to Epson?

Does Kodak have archival inks?

Logged
All the best,
 Sam

framah

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1418
Kodak Printers
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2009, 09:53:21 am »

Apples and oranges.

...or Mercedes and Yugos.
Logged
"It took a  lifetime of suffering and personal sacrifice to develop my keen aesthetic sense."

Gemmtech

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 526
Kodak Printers
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2009, 10:44:10 am »

Quote from: framah
Apples and oranges.

...or Mercedes and Yugos.

I think this answers that question perfectly!    
Logged

Wayne Fox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4237
    • waynefox.com
Kodak Printers
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2009, 02:37:55 pm »

Quote from: SamInTexas
Kodak is advertising their printers as being cost effective for ink replacement.

How do the Kodak printers and ink compare to Epson?

Does Kodak have archival inks?


this depends on the what epson printers you are talking about.  If we are only talking about consumer level printers, which the Kodaks are, then most likely they are as archival as their epson equivalents.  The reason the kodak printers are "cost effective" for ink is the heads are not part of the ink cartridge like other low priced consumer printers, meaning the replacement ink cartridges are cheaper to make.  So cheap consumer Kodak might cost less to print from than cheap consumer Epson.

Certainly the Kodak's aren't any where close to the professional line of Epson printers if comparing ink costs, archival qualities or print quality.
Logged

SamInTexas

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
    • http://www.k5kj.net/
Kodak Printers
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2009, 07:43:55 am »

Quote from: Wayne Fox
this depends on the what epson printers you are talking about.  If we are only talking about consumer level printers, which the Kodaks are, then most likely they are as archival as their epson equivalents.  The reason the kodak printers are "cost effective" for ink is the heads are not part of the ink cartridge like other low priced consumer printers, meaning the replacement ink cartridges are cheaper to make.  So cheap consumer Kodak might cost less to print from than cheap consumer Epson.

Certainly the Kodak's aren't any where close to the professional line of Epson printers if comparing ink costs, archival qualities or print quality.

Wayne, I use an Epson 2200 currently.

Thanks for the reply.
Logged
All the best,
 Sam

Thomas Krüger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 447
    • http://thomaskrueger.eu
Kodak Printers
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2009, 05:59:50 am »

Wilhelm Research has a recent paper about Kodak printers: http://wilhelm-research.com/kodak/esp5250.html
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up