I've recently been offered a new P25+ with 1 year classic warranty + accessories (V fit), a Mamiya RZ adapter plate for Pro II body, advanced Capture U training course for a grand total of GBP £8000 plus vat (15%).
Is that a good deal given the current market shift towards P45+ and P65+ backs?
Just for curiosity sake, which back produce better image quality (or 3D feel), Phase or Leaf?
Many thanks!
That 'feel' is what I've been trying to get through digital images for a while. I'm a film-only guy right now, since that is what I can afford (since I'm a student). But after looking, and LOTS of reading, and some more looking, I like what I've seen off of the Dalsa(Leaf/Sinar) sensors more, straight out of the camera.
I want something to look as close to film as possible. Kodak Portra 160vc/400vc has a certain 'look'.
The other variable that comes into play is "how much?" post-production to get the shot/file where you want it in terms of contrast, overall tone, and curves adjustment.
The 3d affect has its own recent thread here
http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....showtopic=39427Phase now owns Leaf, and both have a Kodak sensor in their top backs, the P65+ and Aptus II 10. So this might change things a bit. The smaller sensors in the Leaf I believe are still the ones from Dalsa.
Leaf has generally been regarded as more "film-like". This is in numerous places you can reference from. The P1 files (to me) look like digital. Maybe I'm just so new to this that I don't know. I've seen great stuff from both straight out though.
The thing that bothers me mostly about the 'look' of digital photography has got to be that the engineers at Kodak and Fuji took YEARS to develop the films we have today/recently... Millions of man hours went into developing that 'look' and 'feel' that we got STRAIGHT OUT of the film. With digital, WE became the darkroom, more work for us, and when you switch cameras/backs, you switch films essentially. Hence, a Canon almost always looks different than a Nikon, even when shot in the same lighting, same focal length lens, same time, etc... All the variables are the same except the camera and the lens.
Now don't get thinking that I'm ALL ANALOG,
NO DIGITAL, cause I'm not. I just start with film, and scan it, editing in PS. I love the fine control that PS gives. Repeatability as well..
sorry though, I don't know if 8K is a good price or not. The RZ adapter plates come up on ebay now and again, I've seen a few for the RZ-->H1 adapter sell for $300-6/700 range. I've bid on a few, losing all unfortunately. I've got a H2 and an RZ kit, that's why.
best of luck though!
There are plenty of very knowledgeable people on this site, along with many daily users of P1 backs as well as Leaf/Sinar and Hassy.
-Dan