Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Art Criticism by the Numbers  (Read 2880 times)

bill t.

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3011
    • http://www.unit16.net
Art Criticism by the Numbers
« on: October 07, 2009, 04:29:23 pm »

Big timesaver when you just can't find the right words.

http://www.pixmaven.com/phrase_generator.html
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Art Criticism by the Numbers
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2009, 04:51:51 pm »

Bill, Interesting gadget, but from the testing I did I'd say it wasn't designed to descend into the same depths of incoherence and self-congratulation I see in actual artists' statements in museums. It needs work.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

David Sutton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1345
    • David Sutton Photography
Art Criticism by the Numbers
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2009, 05:47:00 pm »

Quote from: RSL
Bill, Interesting gadget, but from the testing I did I'd say it wasn't designed to descend into the same depths of incoherence and self-congratulation I see in actual artists' statements in museums. It needs work.
Russ, just add a few extra words to the program's output and you'll pretty well get there. Here is my list.
Contra-indicated
Advisedly
Eponymous
Rictus
Matrix
Corruscating
Organic
Iconic
Ironic
Juxtaposition
Contemporary
Postmodern
Slippage
Dichotomy
Representational/abstract

I sense that the use of postmodern and contemporary vis a vis the almost organic relationship between the viewer and viewed, the iconic juxtaposition of non representational art and representational critique, is now contra-indicated. They have suffered slippage. How ironic.
David
Logged

AndrewKulin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 342
    • http://www.andrewkulin.com
Art Criticism by the Numbers
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2009, 08:37:26 pm »

I'm troubled by how the internal dynamic of the biomorphic forms verges on codifying a participation in the critical dialogue of the 90s.

Andrew
Logged
[size=12p

Nick Rains

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 705
    • http://www.nickrains.com
Art Criticism by the Numbers
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2009, 09:07:32 pm »

Quote from: AndrewKulin
I'm troubled by how the internal dynamic of the biomorphic forms verges on codifying a participation in the critical dialogue of the 90s.

Andrew

Generate your own Post Modern Art here:

http://www.donrelyea.com/resampled_lo_fi_hilberts.htm

and then write an essay about it here:

http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

each time you load it you get a new essay.

Makes as much sense as some critiques I have read!
Logged
Nick Rains
Australian Photographer Leica

ckimmerle

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 441
    • http://www.chuckkimmerle.com
Art Criticism by the Numbers
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2009, 09:27:10 pm »

If anyone is interested in some world class verbosity, the late, great Bill Jay (I sure will miss his Lenswork columns) wrote on this very subject:

http://www.billjayonphotography.com/MadonnaMadeMeDoIt.pdf

Great stuff.

Chuck
Logged
"The real voyage of discove
Pages: [1]   Go Up