Maybe my post is worthless or meaningful for many of you, but i look at Canon/Nikon DSLR shots at 100% on computer and also my Hasselblad H3DII-39 and i got blown away easily with my H3D and not with any of Canon/Nikon, i don't have Nikon D3X [just downloaded samples from the net] or 5D mkII, but i have 1Ds3 and 1Ds2 and 5D classic, and none of them wowing me against my H3DII, even i did a simple test [not sure if i said that here before] with my H3DII against my 1DsIII, the H3DII was the winner in term of sharpness, color, and contrast, so i dunno if i print how come that those 35mm DSLR can be amazing and maybe same as MFDB when in real tests the MFDB are the winner in most cases? I cropped many shots from Canon and Hasselblad, the hasselblad crops were the winners always over the Canon crops no doubt whatever i do, i know that may not get you any help or interested, but from what i see i love MF very much and i will always use it for what i can shoot with them and print at any size, i have also Epson 3800 and i print A2 [17x22/17x25] and planning to go larger [44" printer], so i think i should make whistles for how good those new current and upcoming 35mm DSLR, then tell me honestly what is the benefit and worth to get those MFDB if you prints large say up to 40" and all can be great good enough, what will make those MFDB an advantage over DSLRs then? and why they are so expensive in this case? i really couldn't get any honest truth answers anywhere because many trying to make those DSLRs as good as MFDB even in prints, and even some saying that DSLRs quality is better than MFDB like what they are doing with Nikon D3X against Hasselblad/Phase One DBs.