Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Stone III  (Read 1793 times)

Timo Löfgren

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 207
Stone III
« on: September 08, 2009, 02:29:04 AM »

.......
Logged

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8132
Stone III
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2009, 03:46:22 AM »

I love this one almost as much as Stone II. The texture of the f/g rocks and the cloudy sky are really pleasant.
Logged
Francois

Ed Blagden

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 491
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/ed-blagden
Stone III
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2009, 04:53:58 AM »

It's OK but personally I preferred Stone II, which was very special.  For my taste, there is a but too much going on in the foreground in this one and I wish I could see a bit more of that hill (or is it an island?) at top right.
Logged
Visit my Flickr page

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8132
Stone III
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2009, 05:00:44 AM »

Quote from: Ed B
It's OK but personally I preferred Stone II, which was very special.  For my taste, there is a but too much going on in the foreground in this one and I wish I could see a bit more of that hill (or is it an island?) at top right.
Stone II was very minimalist and I that's why I love it. Stone III is more busy, a more classical representation.
Logged
Francois

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11097
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Stone III
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2009, 10:37:09 AM »

I like it, but I also prefer Stone II.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my photo website. New images each season. Also visit my new website: http://ericneedsakidney.org

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1371
Stone III
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2009, 10:37:09 AM »

Quote from: francois
Stone II was very minimalist and I that's why I love it. Stone III is more busy, a more classical representation.
I don't know if I would use 'busy' to describe this image. It is well composed and strikes me, metaphorically speaking, as the earth giving birth to new life where the earth meets the water. Love it.

JMR
Logged

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8132
Stone III
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2009, 11:07:15 AM »

Quote from: John R
I don't know if I would use 'busy' to describe this image. It is well composed and strikes me, metaphorically speaking, as the earth giving birth to new life where the earth meets the water. Love it.

JMR
Stone 2 was minimalist compared to Stone 3. I'm sorry if my comment was unclear.
Logged
Francois

JeffKohn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1670
    • http://jeffk-photo.typepad.com
Stone III
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2009, 04:47:30 PM »

I also preferred Stone II. There's just a little too much foreground in this one for me. Also the light on the boulder doesn't seem quite as nice as in II.
Pages: [1]   Go Up