I agree it's distracting. I wonder if either a layer mask with strongly toned down brightness would take care of that. On the other hand, I feel like some careful cloning could manipulate that fence into being a few inches taller than it actually is....but I wonder if that pushes the limits of integrity.
"limits of integrity"... hmmmm now that really opens a can of worms, considering the historical evidence regarding photojournalism and processing images in photoshop; and the nature of the 'reality ' of a photograph. Tweaking colour hues, sharpening, local contrast enhancement, cropping, the use of healing brush and cloning tools, use of various filters...etc..etc... what is the boundary of 'integrity' with a photograph?
This could undoubtedly be the topic of a new thread, which would probably create a deal of discussion yet no clear consensus. Ultimately, it is your choice and how you think 'integrity' is manifest through and by your photograph.
In this particular instance, it is only a fence after all....and in my opinion, having the boy able to speak to us more effectively without visual distractions is far better than having an image which loses impact because of them.
Julie