Hi,
I'm on a really tight budget and still using Photoshop 7. So many things cost an extra $300 - 2300 these days!
Is Lightroom at all standalone. I don't mind saving as tif and opening with my 7 if need be. It seems, from what
I hear, that most raw adjustment can be done with it and better as well.
Thanks group,
Bill
Yep. In terms of RAW conversion LR is every bit as powerful as PS's Camera RAW.
There are a bunch of things Lightroom doesn't offer that Photoshop does depending on the work you do--LR doesn't give you the kinds of tools you want for CYMK separations if you do those, it doesn't offer correction for lens distortion (e.g., barrel/pincushion distortion) or perspective the way Filter>Distort>Lens Correct... does (was that even in PS7?). The healing tools in LR aren't quite as useful for a few types of defects as the tools in PS/CS2 or later.
But...
LR's file organization tools are far better than PS/Bridge (to my mind), the global correction tools include everything that Adobe Camera RAW does and with a nicer interface, LR does offer printing and print layout tools (but not soft-proofing), simple automated web gallery and slideshow creation tools.
In my business, I can't quite get away with not having both, but most of my students are quite happy to live entirely in the world of Lightroom.
--Joe