Hi Michael,
Great to see a video review of the rm3d. As an arca swiss digital user I've been keen to see more of this camera than I have.
I think there are a couple of errors in what you say on the video review:
The written review you say:
"The size is a bit larger than some alternatives, but since there are both rise and fall and shift movements on the front standard the additional size over an Alpa TC, for example, is quite appropriate."
On the video they look to be on the rear, which would be better.
You highlight a choice by arca to give 30mm fall and 10mm rise as a strange one because for architecture you want to extend the height of the image on the most part. However, seeing as this movement is on the rear of the camera then the 30mm fall would translate to an extended height in the image and so you wouldn't have to turn the camera upside down for most of architectural photography.
My analysis will obviously be wrong if all the movements are on the front.
Nick