Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Galloping away  (Read 4935 times)

byork

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 125
    • http://
Galloping away
« on: May 11, 2009, 07:56:17 am »

Any thoughts or comments would be appreciated.

Cheers
Brian
Logged

Josh-H

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2079
    • Wild Nature Photo Travel
Galloping away
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2009, 09:32:09 am »

Quote from: byork
Any thoughts or comments would be appreciated.

Cheers
Brian

Really like the dynamism and movement in the horses - as well as the drama in the sky - I would crop it a little tighter - particularly on the left to emphasis the power and speed and movement of the horses.

Great capture.
Logged
Wild Nature Photo Travel

jasonrandolph

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 554
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/shutterpunk
Galloping away
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2009, 11:34:02 am »

I like the sharpness.  You used a fast enough shutter speed to completely freeze motion.  Nicely done.  Composition-wise, I was a little bothered by the houses right above the horses' backs.  I realize that sometimes you can't frame a fast shot like this, but I would've tried to set it up to the houses were either in front of or behind the horses.  Also, I think the Rule of Thirds would have worked well here.

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13792
Galloping away
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2009, 11:41:41 am »

Quote from: Josh-H
Really like the dynamism and movement in the horses - as well as the drama in the sky - I would crop it a little tighter - particularly on the left to emphasis the power and speed and movement of the horses.

Great capture.
Agreed! There's too much empty space on the left.

Otherwise, it's very nicely done. Congratulations!
Logged
Francois

byork

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 125
    • http://
Galloping away
« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2009, 08:17:36 pm »

Thanks for all the comments...here's an amended version. Lost some of the dramatic sky in the top left when cropping left side, so took a little off the top as well to balance up.

What do you think
Logged

Josh-H

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2079
    • Wild Nature Photo Travel
Galloping away
« Reply #5 on: May 11, 2009, 08:32:51 pm »

Quote from: byork
Thanks for all the comments...here's an amended version. Lost some of the dramatic sky in the top left when cropping left side, so took a little off the top as well to balance up.

What do you think

I think thats a much better crop - again - great shot.
Logged
Wild Nature Photo Travel

Randy Carone

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 628
Galloping away
« Reply #6 on: May 11, 2009, 09:53:03 pm »

Beautiful final version!
Logged
Randy Carone

byork

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 125
    • http://
Galloping away
« Reply #7 on: May 11, 2009, 10:03:04 pm »

Thanks Randy.
Logged

jasonrandolph

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 554
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/shutterpunk
Galloping away
« Reply #8 on: May 12, 2009, 01:07:22 am »

I agree.  Much better.  But it was already good!

kenlip

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15
Galloping away
« Reply #9 on: June 01, 2009, 04:35:35 am »

Quote from: jasonrandolph
I agree.  Much better.  But it was already good!


The image can be greatly improved by some selective burning of the roofs of the barns above the horses' backs and of the whole barn on the left.   If you can reduce the distraction of the barns, you will have a definite wall-hanger.

Ken
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Galloping away
« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2009, 12:16:42 pm »

Brian, I like the cropped shot but there's a color cast -- too much red and yellow in it. Bring it up in Photoshop, bring up Levels, select the middle-gray dropper, and click the underside of a cloud -- not the lightest part or the darkest part, but a part of the cloud that's middling dark. Here's what you'll get:

[attachment=14210:Galloping_away_1.jpg]
« Last Edit: June 01, 2009, 12:16:57 pm by RSL »
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

byork

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 125
    • http://
Galloping away
« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2009, 07:05:39 pm »

Thanks for the tip Russ....went back to the raw image and reset WB, it is a much more natural look. I have to put my hand up and confess I cranked up WB in an attempt at more drama and to give the horses a "glow", especially the chestnut at the rear. If people don't like it, then it hasn't worked  . Oh well, as they say, do not be afraid to make mistakes...for this is the way we learn!

Cheers
Brian
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Galloping away
« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2009, 09:45:21 pm »

Quote from: byork
Thanks for the tip Russ....went back to the raw image and reset WB, it is a much more natural look. I have to put my hand up and confess I cranked up WB in an attempt at more drama and to give the horses a "glow", especially the chestnut at the rear. If people don't like it, then it hasn't worked  . Oh well, as they say, do not be afraid to make mistakes...for this is the way we learn!

Cheers
Brian

Brian, Actually I like the "glow" very much, and especially on the chestnut. The problem is that because there are clouds that you'd expect to see as middle gray, the color cast jumps out at you. I guess what I'd do is see if I could get a decent selection on the horses, save the selection in case I need to come back to it later, make an adjustment layer with the selection and then see if I could bring back the glow just on the horses. It'd take some tedious work but it might be well worth it.

It's a fine shot in any case.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

jasonrandolph

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 554
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/shutterpunk
Galloping away
« Reply #13 on: June 02, 2009, 12:56:32 am »

Russ, I like your adjustment.  It brought out a detail I missed in the original... the numbers on the horse in the foreground.  Better crop too.  With all that said, I think the original capture was still quite good.  The detail in outstanding.

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Galloping away
« Reply #14 on: June 02, 2009, 11:43:03 am »

Brian, The color isn't coming through properly on this posting, but this is the kind of thing I was talking about. Using the Quick Selection tool I was able to pull a pretty accurate selection of the horses, make a masking layer, and then increase the red and yellow saturation just on the horses. To do it right you'd have to work on the original .psd. In the copy I have here the horses are almost the same color as they were on your original -- before the global color adjustment, but they don't look the same once the result is on the web.

[attachment=14237:Galloping_away_2.jpg]
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

byork

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 125
    • http://
Galloping away
« Reply #15 on: June 02, 2009, 08:15:28 pm »

Russ, had a go at that myself yesterday after reading your suggestion, also using the quick selection tool. This is what I ended up with (hope the colour comes through okay).
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Galloping away
« Reply #16 on: June 02, 2009, 10:11:44 pm »

Quote from: byork
Russ, had a go at that myself yesterday after reading your suggestion, also using the quick selection tool. This is what I ended up with (hope the colour comes through okay).

Yes! That's it. The color came through very well and I think you've got a real winner with this version. Congratulations.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5248
Galloping away
« Reply #17 on: June 03, 2009, 11:50:07 am »

All these versions are a diversion. No, seriously, one can quibble and negotiate certain aspects, but the shot is great not matter how you nuance it.

JMR
Logged

dalethorn

  • Guest
Galloping away
« Reply #18 on: June 03, 2009, 03:57:31 pm »

This is a really tough one.  I like the sky better on the last than the first, but, the natural yellow tint in the grass on the first is mostly gone now, and the color of the horses has gone from a wee bit too red to slightly greenish brown.  So I was thinking - about half of that shift away from red would be about perfect, except the sky which looks great now.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up