".....do Mamiya still produce those awful yellow lenses that make everything look as if it was taken with over-exposed high-speed ecktachrome? ...."
"....And then there are the Leica lenses vs Mamiya lenses. Mamiya lenses are fine but I am convinced most people here will expect the Leica lenses to perform even a little better......"
In several forums, any comment, especilly strongly critical, on Mamyia lenses leave to severe counter attack. I am sorry, but if you read reviews, watch comments, you will find
1. Hardly any complaints of zeiss and leica lenses
2. Many negative comments, even on Hasselblad (including MR's 'exploding' zoom :-)
3. Extreme sensitivity by certaim Mamyia owners to ANY criticism
Why is this? At 67 , I continue to marvel at a dictum I have said and believed for years"...be approximately right, not precisely wrong.."
Mamyia seems to be improving, and some lens shats can be great. But the 28mm was severely criticized here, and leaf shutters are still vapor.
In the meantime, Zeiss (incl the Japanes built Zeiss designed Contax, that socalled DEAD system) in all forms and Leica garner kudos.
In general, it seems pretty obvious Zeiss and Leica lenses are in a top class shared I guess by Hasselblad-J (with a few excuses for some early missteps)
There are other criteria, like availability, 'openness' etc that come into all our decisions; oh, and of course, PRICE>
SO, for those who fight the preponderance of evidence, and also get good images from Mamyia, or Nikon or Canan, I see no reason for those of us to battle. For those of us who favour Zeiss and Leica design and execution, well, for all the foot stomping (and yes, psychological pressure that forum owners use Mamyia in one of its guises) we should proably stop even mentioning any comparison with M, as I did on another forum (after a comment was taken WAAAAY too personnally by a M owner) , saying what the rest of the photographic world and market and price point have said for years. The Zeiss and Leicas, are, not always, but in general better image makers, and as with Mercedes or BMW etc the bulk of the world will choose not to pay for them.
Mamyia, Canon and Nikon make compromises that allow more accessibility. Zeiss and Leica products are EXPENSIVE, and may not be prudent purchases for many. Except for the independently wealthy, we all make choices. We don't eat out, or rent a lot of movies and a lot of other daily expenses; at the end of the year we have enough for a european vacation (business class seats, 4 seasons hotels, at discount :-) and buy one or two lenses.
Companies make trade offs, people make trade offs. That is not going to make a Mercedes quality avaible at a Chevy price, no matter what you say.
But, like Voightlander (that I use on my M8 with great satisfaction) that is both cheap and really good, if Mamyia can do both, I will be the first in line to buy-- but, sorry, for me they ain;t there yet.
regards
Victor