Yes: http://www.leaf-photography.com/imgs/uploa...iII-aptusII.pdf
Why has no one stated this before:Landscape photographers like high resolution backs:
1) The Aptus II 10 has a significantly larger Horizontal resolution chip that is proven on view cameras compared to the P65+
2) The Aptus II 10 costs $25K and the Phase Back costs $45K
So the question is, are you prepared to pay $20K for Sensor plus technology which you may never use ?!
Then there is the question of possibly a superior LCD screen, an internally rotating chip and maybe a marginally faster FPS shooting speed!!
On paper it seems like a better product at half the price, I'd hate to see the hyped up (over-hyped ?) P65+ dive a great product into second place (yes some of the things about the P65+ maybe great, but they are not exclusive - only the price )
Just to calrify what I mean, I don't think michael's review was partisan or over hyped or anything he calls it as he sees it - I don't doubt that hte P65 is the best back he has ever used and sure it was a well reasoned purchase (did he demo the Leaf product, did somethign put him off ?). Is the mamiya platform a big enough reason to spend an extra $20 ? What's to stop one buying a mamiya AFDIII at any rate ? Is the AFi-10 out of the window by default, if so why ?
Since this site is now the oricle of all things big sensor (no offense Frank, your site is great, but not as many visitors) it would be nice if somone offered a counter piece on the Leaf product and a direct comparision would definitely stop a forum brand based slanging match (we're above that?) - if the hard facts are there for all to see